Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27287332›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of medical research2016

Breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy: review and personal technique IDEAL concept REV-EJMR-D-15-00268.

Carolin Nestle-Krämling, Edwin Bölke, Wilfried Budach, Christoph Andree

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of medical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Long-term quality of life after preoperative radiochemotherapy in patients with localized and locally advanced breast cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  7. Long-term cosmetic outcome after preoperative radio-/chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2019
    Article
  8. Prophylactic Surgery: For Whom, When and How?Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carolin Nestle-KrämlingDepartment of Senology, Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf-Gerresheim, Graeulinger Straße 120, 40625, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Edwin BölkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. boelke@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Wilfried BudachDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christoph AndreeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf-Gerresheim, Graeulinger Straße 120, 40625, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy and immediate reconstruction for breast cancer are still under debate. But there are recent abstracts and articles which show that neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy is feasible and could improve the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. The aim of this review is to present the authors' techniques and approaches with regard to neoadjuvant radiation of breast cancer patients. It seems that the concept of immediate implant delayed autologous breast reconstruction could be a safe procedure that is at least equivalent to primary autologous reconstruction.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantMammaplastyNeoadjuvant TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansAutologous breast reconstructionBreast implantDIEP flapIDEAL breast reconstructionImmediate breast reconstructionNeoadjuvant radio chemotherapyTRAM flap

Identifiers

PMID27287332
PMCPMC4902933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.