SynthesisPituitary2016
Clinical prevalence and outcome impact of pituitary dysfunction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pituitary, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of pituitary dysfunction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2023Pooled it
- The Prognostic Significance of Low-Triiodothyronine Syndrome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Endocrine Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: An Ignored Clinical Syndrome?Neurocritical care · 2023Review
- Review
- Pituitary dysfunction and association with fatigue in stroke and other acute brain injury.Endocrine connections · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePituitary dysfunction is reported to be a common complication following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze the literature on clinical prevalence, risk factors and outcome impact of pituitary dysfunction after aSAH, and to assess the possible need for pituitary screening in aSAH patients.
methodsWe performed a systematic review with meta-analysis based on a comprehensive search of four databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI/Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar).
resultsA total of 20 papers met criteria for inclusion. The prevalence of pituitary dysfunction in the acute phase (within the first 6 months after aSAH) was 49.30 % (95 % CI 41.6-56.9), decreasing in the chronic phase (after 6 months from aSAH) to 25.6 % (95 % CI 18.0-35.1). Abnormalities in basal hormonal levels were more frequent when compared to induction tests, and the prevalence of a single pituitary hormone dysregulation was more frequent than multiple pituitary hormone dysregulation. Increasing age was associated with a lower prevalence of endocrine dysfunction in the acute phase, and surgical treatment of the aneurysm (clipping) was related to a higher prevalence of single hormone dysfunction. The prevalence of pituitary dysfunction did not correlate with the outcome of the patient.
conclusionsNeuroendocrine dysfunction is common after aSAH, but these abnormalities have not been shown to consistently impact outcome in the data available. There is a need for well-designed prospective studies to more precisely assess the incidence, clinical course, and outcome impact of pituitary dysfunction after aSAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.