Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27287010›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2016

Total body irradiation-an attachment free sweeping beam technique.

Petra M Härtl, Marius Treutwein, Matthias G Hautmann, Manuel März, Fabian Pohl, Oliver Kölbl, Barbara Dobler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Petra M HärtlDepartment of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
Marius TreutweinDepartment of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany. marius.treutwein@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6538-9980
Matthias G HautmannDepartment of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
Manuel MärzDepartment of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
Fabian PohlDepartment of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
Oliver KölblDepartment of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
Barbara DoblerDepartment of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA sweeping beam technique for total body irradiation in standard treatment rooms and for standard linear accelerators (linacs) is introduced, which does not require any accessory attached to the linac. Lung shielding is facilitated to reduce the risk of pulmonary toxicity. Additionally, the applicability of a commercial radiotherapy planning system (RTPS) is examined. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe patient is positioned on a low couch on the floor, the longitudinal axis of the body in the rotational plane of the linac. Eight arc fields and five additional fixed beams are applied to the patient in supine and prone position respectively. The dose distributions were measured in a solid water phantom and in an Alderson phantom. Diode detectors were calibrated for in-vivo dosimetry. The RTPS Oncentra was employed for calculations of the dose distribution.

resultsFor the cranial 120 cm the longitudinal dose profile in a slab phantom measured with ionization chamber varies between 94 and 107 % of the prescription dose. These values were confirmed by film measurements and RTPS calculations. The transmittance of the lung shields has been determined as a function of the thickness of the absorber material. Measurements in an Alderson phantom and in-vivo dosimetry of the first patients match the calculated dose. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionA treatment technique with clinically good dose distributions has been introduced, which can be applied with each standard linac and in standard treatment rooms. Dose calculations were performed with a commercial RTPS and should enable individual dose optimization.

Indexed as

Patient Care PlanningPhantoms, ImagingCalibrationHumansLungOrgan Sparing TreatmentsParticle AcceleratorsRadiation InjuriesRadiometryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedWhole-Body Irradiation3D treatment planningDosimetryLung shieldingSweeping beam techniqueTotal body irradiation

Identifiers

PMID27287010
PMCPMC4902948
OpenAlexW2413046653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.