Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27286654›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

HIV provider and patient perspectives on the Development of a Health Department "Data to Care" Program: a qualitative study.

Julia C Dombrowski, James W Carey, Nicole Pitts, Jason Craw, Arin Freeman, Matthew R Golden, Jeanne Bertolli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Julia C DombrowskiDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359777, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA. jdombrow@uw.edu.
James W CareyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nicole PittsICF International, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jason CrawCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Arin FreemanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Matthew R GoldenPublic Health - Seattle & King County HIV/STD Program, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jeanne BertolliCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USICF International (United States) · USPublic Health – Seattle & King County · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Judith Tsui · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Clinic and Population-Based Approaches to Retention in HIV CareK23MH090923 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOMBROWSKI, JULIA COOK · 2010 to 2014
$657k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH090923NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH095060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundU.S. health departments have not historically used HIV surveillance data for disease control interventions with individuals, but advances in HIV treatment and surveillance are changing public health practice. Many U.S. health departments are in the early stages of implementing "Data to Care" programs to assists persons living with HIV (PLWH) with engaging in care, based on information collected for HIV surveillance. Stakeholder engagement is a critical first step for development of these programs. In Seattle-King County, Washington, the health department conducted interviews with HIV medical care providers and PLWH to inform its Data to Care program. This paper describes the key themes of these interviews and traces the evolution of the resulting program.

methodsDisease intervention specialists conducted individual, semi-structured qualitative interviews with 20 PLWH randomly selected from HIV surveillance who had HIV RNA levels >10,000 copies/mL in 2009-2010. A physician investigator conducted key informant interviews with 15 HIV medical care providers. Investigators analyzed de-identified interview transcripts, developed a codebook of themes, independently coded the interviews, and identified codes used most frequently as well as illustrative quotes for these key themes. We also trace the evolution of the program from 2010 to 2015.

resultsPLWH generally accepted the idea of the health department helping PLWH engage in care, and described how hearing about the treatment experiences of HIV seropositive peers would assist them with engagement in care. Although many physicians were supportive of the Data to Care concept, others expressed concern about potential health department intrusion on patient privacy and the patient-physician relationship. Providers emphasized the need for the health department to coordinate with existing efforts to improve patient engagement. As a result of the interviews, the Data to Care program in Seattle-King County was designed to incorporate an HIV-positive peer component and to ensure coordination with HIV care providers in the process of relinking patients to care.

conclusionsHealth departments can build support for Data to Care efforts by gathering input of key stakeholders, such as HIV medical and social service providers, and coordinating with clinic-based efforts to re-engage patients in care.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CarePublic Health SurveillanceRegistriesAdolescentAdultCommunity-Institutional RelationsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedProgram DevelopmentWashingtonYoung AdultHIV care continuumHIV preventionPublic HealthQualitative researchSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID27286654
PMCPMC4901404
OpenAlexW2410948424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.