ArticleBMC research notes2016
A survey of primary care patients' readiness to engage in the de-adoption practices recommended by Choosing Wisely Canada.
Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk perception, attitudes, and quality of life in a multicomponent benzodiazepine deprescription strategy.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, Motivations, Expectations, and Systemic Factors Regarding Antimicrobial Use Amongst Community Members Seeking Care at the Primary Healthcare Level: A Scoping Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Emotional barriers and facilitators of deprescribing for older adults with cancer and polypharmacy: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Examining the barriers and recommendations for integrating more equitable insomnia treatment options in primary care.Frontiers in sleep · 2023Article
- Patient and family involvement in Choosing Wisely initiatives: a mixed methods study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Does de-implementation of low-value care impact the patient-clinician relationship? A mixed methods study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Prescriber perspectives on low-value prescribing: A qualitative study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Article
- How do healthcare professionals make decisions concerning low-value care practices? Study protocol of a factorial survey experiment on de-implementation.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- How artificial intelligence can help us 'Choose Wisely'.Bioelectronic medicine · 2021Article
- Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Understanding determinants of patients' decisions to attend their family physician and to take antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Article
- Understanding the public's role in reducing low-value care: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- Semistructured interviews regarding patients' perceptions of Choosing Wisely and shared decision-making: an Australian study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- An Evidence-Based Health Care Knowledge Integration System: Assessment Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2019Article
- Observational
- Article
- Increasing access to and utilization of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I): a narrative review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Review
- Studying de-implementation in health: an analysis of funded research grants.Implementation science : IS · 2017Article
- Older Adults' Awareness of Deprescribing: A Population-Based Survey.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStrategies such as Choosing Wisely have been established to identify the overuse of interventions considered as low-value. Reduction of low-value practices will require patients to understand why certain interventions are no longer recommended. The objective of this study was to determine whether older adults accept the rationale for and perceive themselves ready to de-adopt annual electrocardiogram testing, imaging for low back pain, the use of antibiotics for sinusitis, the use of sedative-hypnotics for insomnia, and the use of antipsychotics to treat behavioural symptoms of dementia.
methodsA self-administered iPad survey was distributed to consecutive patients aged 50 years and older, presenting to three primary care outpatient practices in Ontario, Canada. Data from patients who were able and willing to complete the survey while waiting to see their physician were included. The survey queried knowledge, attitudes and behaviours around the targeted low-value interventions, before and after exposure to a Choosing Wisely Canada patient educational brochure on one of these five topics. A subset of patients agreed to participate in a semi-structured interview after their clinic visit.
resultsThree-hundred and forty-four patients (mean age 63, range 50-88, 59 % female) read the materials and completed the survey. Forty-eight percent (95 % CI 43-53 %) intended to discuss the information with a healthcare provider. Forty-five percent (95 % CI 40-51 %) expressed a desire to change current low-value practices. Approximately two-thirds of those who indicated they would not change future behaviours explained that it was because they were already espousing the Choosing Wisely values. After reading the Choosing Wisely brochures, knowledge improved independent of age, sex and education in 48 % (95 % CI 38-57 %) of participants about electrocardiogram testing, in 74 % (95 % CI 65-82 %) about use of antipsychotics, in 66 % (95 % CI 52-78 %) about use of antibiotics for sinusitis, in 60 % (95 % CI 46-72 %) about imaging for low back pain, and in 40 % (95 % CI 26-55 %) about sedative-hypnotic use in the elderly.
conclusionsThe majority of primary care patients seem ready to de-adopt low-value practices. Provision of education in clinic waiting rooms can help improve knowledge around unnecessary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.