Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27286308›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2016

Extracellular Recording of Neuronal Activity Combined with Microiontophoretic Application of Neuroactive Substances in Awake Mice.

Yaneri A Ayala, David Pérez-González, Daniel Duque, Alan R Palmer, Manuel S Malmierca

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Headpost Surgery forBio-protocol · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yaneri A AyalaAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León, University of Salamanca.
David Pérez-GonzálezAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León, University of Salamanca.
Daniel DuqueAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León, University of Salamanca; Neural Systems Laboratory, Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland.
Alan R PalmerMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research.
Manuel S MalmiercaAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León, University of Salamanca; Department of Cell Biology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca; msm@usal.es.
Universidad de Salamanca · ESMedical Research Council · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U135097126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in the activity of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, and consequently different neural responses, can be found between anesthetized and awake animals. Therefore, methods allowing the manipulation of synaptic systems in awake animals are required in order to determine the contribution of synaptic inputs to neuronal processing unaffected by anesthetics. Here, we present methodology for the construction of electrodes to simultaneously record extracellular neural activity and release multiple neuroactive substances at the vicinity of the recording sites in awake mice. By combining these procedures, we performed microiontophoretic injections of gabazine to selectively block GABAA receptors in neurons of the inferior colliculus of head-restrained mice. Gabazine successfully modified neural response properties such as the frequency response area and stimulus-specific adaptation. Thus, we demonstrate that our methods are suitable for recording single-unit activity and for dissecting the role of specific neurotransmitter receptors in auditory processing. The main limitation of the described procedure is the relatively short recording time (~3 hr), which is determined by the level of habituation of the animal to the recording sessions. On the other hand, multiple recording sessions can be performed in the same animal. The advantage of this technique over other experimental procedures used to manipulate the level of neurotransmission or neuromodulation (such as systemic injections or the use of optogenetic models), is that the drug effect is confined to the local synaptic inputs to the target neuron. In addition, the custom-manufacture of electrodes allows adjustment of specific parameters according to the neural structure and type of neuron of interest (such as the tip resistance for improving the signal-to-noise ratio of the recordings).

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsInferior ColliculiMiceMonitoring, PhysiologicNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsWakefulnessNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID27286308
PMCPMC4927710
OpenAlexW2404965668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.