SynthesisPloS one2016
Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies of Suicide Risk Assessment among Psychiatric Patients: Heterogeneity in Results and Lack of Improvement over Time.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
83 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning algorithms and their predictive accuracy for suicide and self-harm: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Tools to Detect Risk of Death by Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of suicide rates in the first week and the first month after psychiatric hospitalisation.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Suicide Rates After Discharge From Psychiatric Facilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA psychiatry · 2017Pooled it
- Article
- Unconscious And Intersubjective Dynamics of Suicide. Over a Century of Psychoanalytic Perspectives.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2026Article
- Scapegoating in Healthcare: A Primitive Response to Tragedy.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2026Article
- Surfacing Suicidal Risk Through Simulated Social Interaction: Per-Person Language Model Agents as Communicative Stress Tests.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of machine learning approaches for suicide‑related outcomes: a meta‑analysis.Annals of general psychiatry · 2026Article
- Beyond Suicidal Ideation: Identifying High-Risk University Students Through Depression, Sleep Disturbance, and Impulsivity-A Cross-Sectional Secondary Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of a Clinician and Lived Experience Peer Worker Co-Led Aftercare Program on Suicide Risk Factors.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2026Article
- Characterizing suicidal intent among suicidal adolescents: a systematic review.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026Review
- Suicidal and self-harm behaviors in emergency psychiatry: bridging risk assessment and clinical decision-making.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Perceptions and Enhancement Needs of Psychiatric Nurses on Patient Safety Competency: A Phenomenological Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Suicide risk assessment: clinical implications of the unpredictability of suicidal behavior.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Rethinking suicide prevention: from prediction to understanding.BJPsych international · 2025Review
- HLA Class II Alleles and Suicidal Behavior: Evidence from a Case-Control Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Developing a Tool for Identifying Clinical Risk From Free-Text Clinical Records: Natural Language Processing Study.JMIR AI · 2025Article
- Review
23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIt is widely assumed that the clinical care of psychiatric patients can be guided by estimates of suicide risk and by using patient characteristics to define a group of high-risk patients. However, the statistical strength and reliability of suicide risk categorization is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the odds of suicide in high-risk compared to lower-risk categories and the suicide rates in high-risk and lower-risk groups.
methodWe located longitudinal cohort studies where psychiatric patients or people who had made suicide attempts were stratified into high-risk and lower-risk groups for suicide with suicide mortality as the outcome by searching for peer reviewed publications indexed in PubMed or PsychINFO. Electronic searches were supplemented by hand searching of included studies and relevant review articles. Two authors independently extracted data regarding effect size, study population and study design from 53 samples of risk-assessed patients reported in 37 studies.
resultsThe pooled odds of suicide among high-risk patients compared to lower-risk patients calculated by random effects meta-analysis was of 4.84 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 3.79-6.20). Between-study heterogeneity was very high (I2 = 93.3). There was no evidence that more recent studies had greater statistical strength than older studies. Over an average follow up period of 63 months the proportion of suicides among the high-risk patients was 5.5% and was 0.9% among lower-risk patients. The meta-analytically derived sensitivity and specificity of a high-risk categorization were 56% and 79% respectively. There was evidence of publication bias in favour of studies that inflated the pooled odds of suicide in high-risk patients.
conclusionsThe strength of suicide risk categorizations based on the presence of multiple risk factors does not greatly exceed the association between individual suicide risk factors and suicide. A statistically strong and reliable method to usefully distinguish patients with a high-risk of suicide remains elusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.