Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27284683›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Discordant Immune Response with Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes.

Christine Kelly, Katherine M Gaskell, Marty Richardson, Nigel Klein, Paul Garner, Peter MacPherson

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine KellyInstitute of Translation Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Katherine M GaskellMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Program, Blantyre, Malawi.
Marty RichardsonCentre for Evidence Synthesis, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropicla Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Nigel KleinInstitute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul GarnerCentre for Evidence Synthesis, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropicla Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Peter MacPhersonDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA discordant immune response (DIR) is a failure to satisfactorily increase CD4 counts on ART despite successful virological control. Literature on the clinical effects of DIR has not been systematically evaluated. We aimed to summarise the risk of mortality, AIDS and serious non-AIDS events associated with DIR with a systematic review.

methodsThe protocol is registered with the Centre for Review Dissemination, University of York (registration number CRD42014010821). Included studies investigated the effect of DIR on mortality, AIDS, or serious non-AIDS events in cohort studies or cohorts contained in arms of randomised controlled trials for adults aged 16 years or older. DIR was classified as a suboptimal CD4 count (as defined by the study) despite virological suppression following at least 6 months of ART. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to December 2015. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in cohort studies. Two authors applied inclusion criteria and one author extracted data. Risk ratios were calculated for each clinical outcome reported.

resultsOf 20 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 14 different definitions of DIR were used. Risk ratios for mortality in patients with and without DIR ranged between 1.00 (95% CI 0.26 to 3.92) and 4.29 (95% CI 1.96 to 9.38) with the majority of studies reporting a 2 to 3 fold increase in risk.

conclusionsDIR is associated with a marked increase in mortality in most studies but definitions vary widely. We propose a standardised definition to aid the development of management options for DIR.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansImmunity, InnateTreatment OutcomeAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID27284683
PMCPMC4902248
OpenAlexW2419624178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.