ArticleJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)2016
The Effect of Various Mixing Techniques on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Calcium Enriched Mixture.
Article in Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comprehensive review of composition, properties, clinical applications, and future perspectives of calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement: a systematic analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of penetration depth into dentinal tubules and push-out bond strength of zinc oxide and copper doped zinc oxide nanoparticles sealers : an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The Effect of Different Mixing Methods on the Properties of Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement: A Systematic Review ofIranian endodontic journal · 2019Review
- Effects of Different Powder to liquid Ratios on the Push out Bond Strength of CEM Cement on Simulated Perforations in the Furcal Area.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
statement of the problemCorrect proportioning and mixing are essential to ensure cements attain their optimum physical properties. PURPOSE: The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the influence of various mixing techniques including manual, mechanical mixing, and ultrasonic vibration on push-out bond strength of calcium enriched mixture (CEM). MATERIALS AND
methodNinety 2-mm-thick dentin disks were prepared from single-rooted human teeth and filled with CEM mixed with manual, trituration, or ultrasonic methods. Push-out bond strength values of the specimens were measured by a universal testing machine after 3 and 21 days. The samples were then examined under a stereomicroscope at 40× magnification to determine the nature of bond failure. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney test. (p< 0.05).
resultsThe highest (7.59 MPa) and lowest (4.01 MPa) bond strength values were recorded in conventional method (after 21 days) and trituration method (after 3 days), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the three techniques in 3 and 21 days.
conclusionAccording to the results, various mixing techniques had no effect on the push-out bond strength of CEM cement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27284558PMC4885670What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.