Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27284473›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2016

Neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant treatment of Siewert type II gastroesophageal junction cancer: an analysis of data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) registry.

Joseph A Miccio, Oluwadamilola T Oladeru, Jie Yang, Yaqi Xue, Minsig Choi, Yue Zhang, Hannah Yoon, Samuel Ryu, Alexander M Stessin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph A Miccio1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4 Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Oluwadamilola T Oladeru1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4 Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Jie Yang1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4 Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Yaqi Xue1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4 Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Minsig Choi1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4 Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Yue Zhang1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4 Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Hannah Yoon1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4 Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Samuel Ryu1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4 Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Alexander M Stessin1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4 Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Stony Brook University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) has been rising in incidence in recent years. The role of radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of GEJ cancer remains unclear, as the largest prospective trials advocating for either adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combine GEJ cancer with either gastric or esophageal cancer. The aim of the present study is to examine the association of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant treatment with overall and disease-specific survival (DSS) for patients with surgically resected cancer of the true GEJ (Siewert type II).

methodsThe surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) registry database (2001-2011) was queried for cases of surgically resected Siewert type II GEJ cancer. A total of 1,497 patients with resectable GEJ cancer were identified, with 746 receiving adjuvant RT and 751 receiving neoadjuvant RT. Retrospective analysis was performed with the endpoints of overall and DSS.

resultsUsing cox regression and controlling for independent covariates (age, sex, race, stage, grade, histology, and year of diagnosis), we showed that adjuvant RT was associated with a significantly lower death risk [hazard ratio (HR), 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.97; P value=0.0168] and significantly lower disease-specific death risk (HR, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.97; P value=0.0211) as compared to neoadjuvant RT.

conclusionsThis analysis of SEER data showed that adjuvant RT was associated with a survival benefit as compared to neoadjuvant RT for the treatment of Siewert type II GEJ cancer. We suggest future prospective studies to compare outcomes of adjuvant versus neoadjuvant treatment for true GEJ cancer.

Indexed as

adjuvant radiation therapy (RT)Gastroesophageal junction (GEJ)neoadjuvant radiation therapy (neoadjuvant RT)outcomes research

Identifiers

PMID27284473
PMCPMC4880769
OpenAlexW2209717229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.