Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27284422›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2016

Flow cytometric analysis of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial progenitors for clinical purposes in oncology: A critical evaluation.

Marco Danova, Giuditta Comolli, Mariangela Manzoni, Martina Torchio, Giuliano Mazzini

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Endothelial progenitor cells as an angiogenic biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marco DanovaInternal Medicine and Medical Oncology, Vigevano Hospital, ASST Pavia, I-27029 Vigevano, Italy.
Giuditta ComolliMicrobiology and Virology, Biotechnology Laboratories, IRCCS San Matteo Foundation, I-27100 Pavia, Italy.
Mariangela ManzoniMedical Oncology, Crema Hospital, Crema I-26013, Italy.
Martina TorchioInternal Medicine and Medical Oncology, Vigevano Hospital, ASST Pavia, I-27029 Vigevano, Italy.
Giuliano MazziniMolecular Genetics Institute, National Research Council and Biology and Biotechnology Department 'L. Spallanzani', University of Pavia, I-27100 Pavia, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Maggiore · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant tumors are characterized by uncontrolled cell growth and metastatic spread, with a pivotal importance of the phenomenon of angiogenesis. For this reason, research has focused on the development of agents targeting the vascular component of the tumor microenvironment and regulating the angiogenic switch. As a result, the therapeutic inhibition of angiogenesis has become an important component of anticancer treatment, however, its utility is partly limited by the lack of an established methodology to assess its efficacy

Indexed as

biomarkerscirculating endothelial cellsendothelial progenitor cellsflow cytometrysolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID27284422
PMCPMC4888001
OpenAlexW2298526927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.