Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27284097›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2016

'Open-and-close' pituitary surgery in an acromegalic man presenting with excessive sweatiness.

Kitty Kit Ting Cheung, Francis Chun Chung Chow, Anthony Wing Ip Lo

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kitty Kit Ting CheungDepartement of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Francis Chun Chung ChowDepartement of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Anthony Wing Ip LoDivision of Anatomical Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNQueen Mary Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ectopic-acromegaly is rare. Diagnosing ectopic-acromegaly is challenging given that the clinical and biochemical manifestations can be almost indistinguishable from those of patients with growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas. This case report highlights the importance of clinical vigilance in differentiating between the two conditions. A 41-year-old Caucasian man presented with typical features of acromegaly with an enlarged pituitary and a lung lesion. Although excision of the lung mass showed a carcinoid tumour, normalisation of growth hormone factors did not occur soon enough. This led to a presumed diagnosis of a pituitary adenoma. However, no pituitary tumour was identified during trans-sphenoidal surgery. Postoperatively, the patient improved clinically and biochemically. Retrospective histological examination of the excised lung lesion showed a small proportion of tumour cells containing growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH), suggesting ectopic-GHRH production from the lung neuroendocrine tumour. An open-and-close trans-sphenoidal surgery could have been avoided in this patient with ectopic-GHRH acromegaly.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdultCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ErrorsHuman Growth HormoneHumansLung NeoplasmsMalePituitary GlandPituitary NeoplasmsHuman Growth Hormone

Identifiers

PMID27284097
PMCPMC4904386
OpenAlexW2417823814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.