Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27283295›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2016

Baseline Characteristics and Generalizability of Participants in an Internet Smoking Cessation Randomized Trial.

Sarah Cha, Bahar Erar, Raymond S Niaura, Amanda L Graham

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01544153 (Improving Adherence to Web-Based Cessation Programs), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01544153 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Adherence to Web-Based Cessation Programs: A Social Network Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorTruth InitiativeRan2012 to 2017Enrolled5,292ConditionsSmoking CessationArmsWEB, Social Network, Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Improving Adherence to Smoking Cessation Treatment: Smoking Outcomes in a Web-based Randomized Trial.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2018
    Trial
  5. Improving Adherence to Smoking Cessation Treatment: Intervention Effects in a Web-Based Randomized Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reduction in Cigarettes per Day Prospectively Predicts Making a Quit Attempt: A Fine-Grained Secondary Analysis of a Natural History Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  13. Inferring Smoking Status from User Generated Content in an Online Cessation Community.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. How US Smokers Refer to E-cigarettes: An Examination of User-Generated Posts From a Web-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention, 2008-2015.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah ChaSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Truth Initiative, 900 G Street, NW, Fourth Floor, Washington, DC, 20001, USA.
Bahar ErarCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Raymond S NiauraSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Truth Initiative, 900 G Street, NW, Fourth Floor, Washington, DC, 20001, USA.
Amanda L GrahamSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Truth Initiative, 900 G Street, NW, Fourth Floor, Washington, DC, 20001, USA. agraham@truthinitiative.org.

Funding

Improving Adherence to Web-based Cessation Programs: A Social Network ApproachR01CA155489 · NCI · TRUTH INITIATIVE FOUNDATION · PI GRAHAM, AMANDA L · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential for sampling bias in Internet smoking cessation studies is widely recognized. However, few studies have explicitly addressed the issue of sample representativeness in the context of an Internet smoking cessation treatment trial. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to examine the generalizability of participants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of an Internet smoking cessation intervention using weighted data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).

methodsA total of 5290 new users on a smoking cessation website enrolled in the trial between March 2012 and January 2015. Descriptive statistics summarized baseline characteristics of screened and enrolled participants, and multivariate analysis examined predictors of enrollment. Generalizability analyses compared demographic and smoking characteristics of trial participants to current smokers in the 2012-2014 waves of NHIS (n = 19,043) and to an NHIS subgroup based on Internet use and cessation behavior (n = 3664). Effect sizes were obtained to evaluate the magnitude of differences across variables.

resultsPredictors of study enrollment were age, gender, race, education, and motivation to quit. Compared to NHIS smokers, trial participants were more likely to be female, college educated, and daily smokers and to have made a quit attempt in the past year (all effect sizes 0.25-0.60). In comparisons with the NHIS subgroup, differences in gender and education were attenuated, while differences in daily smoking and smoking rate were amplified.

conclusionsFew differences emerged between Internet trial participants and nationally representative samples of smokers, and all were in expected directions. This study highlights the importance of assessing generalizability in a focused and specific manner. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: #NCT01544153.

Indexed as

InternetResearch SubjectsAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearch DesignSmokingSmoking CessationYoung AdultInternetResearch designSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID27283295
PMCPMC5055432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.