Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27283268›Full record

ArticlePain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses2016

Does Attendance at a Sickle Cell Educational Conference Improve Clinician Knowledge and Attitude Toward Patients with Sickle Cell Disease?

Coretta M Jenerette, Cheryl A Brewer, Susan Silva, Paula Tanabe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Coretta M JeneretteSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: coretta.jenerette@unc.edu.
Cheryl A BrewerPrivate Diagnostic Clinic PLLC, Duke Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Susan SilvaDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina.
Paula TanabeDuke University Schools of Nursing and Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Improving Healthcare for Individuals and Families Living with Sickle Cell DiseaseR13MD008817 · NIMHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JENERETTE, CORETTA M., TANABE, PAULA · 2014 to 2014
$48k
NIMHD NIH HHS R13 MD008817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disease associated with both chronic pain and acute painful events referred to as vaso-occlusive crises. Individuals with SCD suffer from a multitude of medical complications in addition to pain. Patients often are stigmatized as "drug-seeking" and receive inadequate pain management. The purpose of this study was to compare clinicians' SCD knowledge and attitudes toward patients with SCD before attending a 2-day conference on SCD (T1) with knowledge and attitudes immediately postconference (T2) and 2 months postconference (T3). A prospective, descriptive survey design was used. The authors administered surveys to assess SCD knowledge and clinicians' attitudes toward patients with SCD at three time points: T1 (N = 59), T2 (N = 38), and T3 (N = 30). SCD knowledge was measured using a 20-item survey, and clinicians' attitudes toward patients with SCD were measured with the General Perceptions About Sickle Cell Patients Scale, which included items on four independent subscales: positive attitudes, negative attitudes, concern-raising behaviors, and red-flag behaviors. The authors compared changes in knowledge and attitude scores between T1-T2 and T1-T3. Overall, knowledge scores were significantly improved (p < .001) and significantly increased between T1-T2 (p < .0001) and T1-T3 (p = .01). Negative attitudes trended lower over the three time points (p = .07), but a significant decrease in the negative attitudes score was only noted for T1-T3 (Z = -2.16.17, p = .03). Attendance at an educational SCD conference was an effective means to improve knowledge and decrease negative attitudes among clinicians. These differences were maintained at 2 months postconference.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultAnemia, Sickle CellClinical CompetenceCongresses as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27283268
PMCPMC4902877
OpenAlexW2417188619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.