ReviewCytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry2017
Translating microfluidics: Cell separation technologies and their barriers to commercialization.
Review in Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vortex-actuated pre-enrichment accelerates human regulatory T cell sorting and improves early fitness.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Siphon-based multichannel acoustofluidic separator for rapid and multiplexed biomolecule detection.Device · 2025Article
- Research on Simulation Optimization of MEMS Microfluidic Structures at the Microscale.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Advances and Applications of Micro- and Mesofluidic Systems.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Essential Fluidics for a Flow Cytometer.Current protocols · 2024Article
- Capillary wave tweezer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Magnetophoretic circuits: A review of device designs and implementation for precise single-cell manipulation.Analytica chimica acta · 2023Review
- A Systematic Analysis of Recent Technology Trends of Microfluidic Medical Devices in the United States.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Microfluidics for Neuronal Cell and Circuit Engineering.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Disposable paper-based microfluidics for fertility testing.iScience · 2022Review
- Review
- Multi-Modal Microfluidics (MMicromachines · 2022Article
- Micro-scale technologies propel biology and medicine.Biomicrofluidics · 2021Article
- Manipulation of single cells inside nanoliter water droplets using acoustic forces.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
- Fully-automated and field-deployable blood leukocyte separation platform using multi-dimensional double spiral (MDDS) inertial microfluidics.Lab on a chip · 2020Article
- Image-Based Single Cell Sorting Automation in Droplet Microfluidics.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Microfluidic tools for probing micro-culprits: Opportunities and challenges in microfluidic diagnostics.EMBO reports · 2020Article
- 3D printing direct to industrial roll-to-roll casting for fast prototyping of scalable microfluidic systems.PloS one · 2020Article
- Fabrication routes via projection stereolithography for 3D-printing of microfluidic geometries for nucleic acid amplification.PloS one · 2020Article
- Circulating tumor cells are associated with poor outcomes in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study.Hepatology international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in microfluidic cell sorting have revolutionized the ways in which cell-containing fluids are processed, now providing performances comparable to, or exceeding, traditional systems, but in a vastly miniaturized format. These technologies exploit a wide variety of physical phenomena to manipulate cells and fluid flow, such as magnetic traps, sound waves and flow-altering micropatterns, and they can evaluate single cells by immobilizing them onto surfaces for chemotherapeutic assessment, encapsulate cells into picoliter droplets for toxicity screenings and examine the interactions between pairs of cells in response to new, experimental drugs. However, despite the massive surge of innovation in these high-performance lab-on-a-chip devices, few have undergone successful commercialization, and no device has been translated to a widely distributed clinical commodity to date. Persistent challenges such as an increasingly saturated patent landscape as well as complex user interfaces are among several factors that may contribute to their slowed progress. In this article, we identify several of the leading microfluidic technologies for sorting cells that are poised for clinical translation; we examine the principal barriers preventing their routine clinical use; finally, we provide a prospectus to elucidate the key criteria that must be met to overcome those barriers. Once established, these tools may soon transform how clinical labs study various ailments and diseases by separating cells for downstream sequencing and enabling other forms of advanced cellular or sub-cellular analysis. © 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.