Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27282486›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunoassay & immunochemistry2016

Evaluation of a time efficient immunization strategy for anti-PAH antibody development.

Xin Li, Stephen L Kaattari, Mary Ann Vogelbein, Michael A Unger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunoassay & immunochemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin Lia Aquatic Health Sciences , Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary , Gloucester Point , Virginia , USA.
Stephen L Kaattaria Aquatic Health Sciences , Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary , Gloucester Point , Virginia , USA.
Mary Ann Vogelbeina Aquatic Health Sciences , Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary , Gloucester Point , Virginia , USA.
Michael A Ungera Aquatic Health Sciences , Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary , Gloucester Point , Virginia , USA.
William & Mary · US

Funding

A real-time antibody-based field assay to predict containment bioavailability inR01ES020949 · NIEHS · VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE · PI KAATTARI, STEPHEN L, UNGER, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2014
$826k
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) with affinity to small molecules can be a time-consuming process. To evaluate shortening the time for mAb production, we examined mouse antisera at different time points post-immunization to measure titer and to evaluate the affinity to the immunogen PBA (pyrene butyric acid). Fusions were also conducted temporally to evaluate antibody production success at various time periods. We produced anti-PBA antibodies 7 weeks post-immunization and selected for anti-PAH reactivity during the hybridoma screening process. Moreover, there were no obvious sensitivity differences relative to antibodies screened from a more traditional 18-week schedule. Our results demonstrate a more time efficient immunization strategy for anti-PAH antibody development that may be applied to other small molecules.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibody SpecificityAntigen-Antibody ReactionsHemocyaninsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPyrenesTime FactorsAntibodies, MonoclonalHemocyaninskeyhole-limpet hemocyaninPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPyrenesaffinityanti-sera titerfusionimmunization strategymAbsPAH

Identifiers

PMID27282486
PMCPMC5036519
OpenAlexW2411529231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.