Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27282438›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Contagious risk taking: social information and context influence wild jackdaws' responses to novelty and risk.

Alison L Greggor, Guillam E McIvor, Nicola S Clayton, Alex Thornton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Animal cognition in an urbanised world.Frontiers in ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Negative emotional contagion and cognitive bias in common ravens (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Ravens (Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alison L GreggorDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Guillam E McIvorCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, TR10 9FE, UK.
Nicola S ClaytonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Alex ThorntonCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, TR10 9FE, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H021817/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although wild animals increasingly encounter human-produced food and objects, it is unknown how they learn to discriminate beneficial from dangerous novelty. Since social learning allows animals to capitalize on the risk-taking of others, and avoid endangering themselves, social learning should be used around novel and unpredictable stimuli. However, it is unclear whether animals use social cues equally around all types of novelty and at all times of year. We assessed whether wild, individually marked jackdaws-a highly neophobic, yet adaptable species-are equally influenced by social cues to consume novel, palatable foods and to approach a startling object. We conducted these tests across two seasons, and found that in both seasons observers were more likely to consume novel foods after seeing a demonstrator do so. In contrast, observers only followed the demonstrator in foraging next to the object during breeding season. Throughout the year more birds were wary of consuming novel foods than wary of approaching the object, potentially leading to jackdaws' greater reliance on social information about food. Jackdaws' dynamic social cue usage demonstrates the importance of context in predicting how social information is used around novelty, and potentially indicates the conditions that facilitate animals' adjustment to anthropogenic disturbance.

Indexed as

Exploratory BehaviorRisk-TakingSocial BehaviorAnimalsChoice BehaviorCrowsFeeding BehaviorMotivationRisk FactorsSeasons

Identifiers

PMID27282438
PMCPMC4901300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.