Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27282331›Full record

ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2016

Effects of signaled and unsignaled alternative reinforcement on persistence and relapse in children and pigeons.

John A Nevin, F Charles Mace, Iser G DeLeon, Timothy A Shahan, Kenneth D Shamlian, Keith Lit, Tara Sheehan, Michelle A Frank-Crawford, Stephanie L Trauschke, Mary M Sweeney and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Need to Distinguish between "Lapse" and "Relapse".Perspectives on behavior science · 2025
    Article
  3. Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2024
    Article
  4. Relapse and its mitigation: Toward behavioral inoculation.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Resurgence in humans: Reducing relapse by increasing generalization between treatment and testing.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Randomization tests as alternative analysis methods for behavior-analytic data.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2019
    Article
  12. Baseline reinforcement rate and resurgence of destructive behavior.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

John A NevinUniversity of New Hampshire.
F Charles MaceNova Southeastern University.
Iser G DeLeonKennedy Krieger Institute.
Timothy A ShahanUtah State University.
Kenneth D ShamlianNova Southeastern University.
Keith LitNova Southeastern University.
Tara SheehanNova Southeastern University.
Michelle A Frank-CrawfordKennedy Krieger Institute.
Stephanie L TrauschkeNova Southeastern University.
Mary M SweeneyUtah State University.
Danielle R TarverNova Southeastern University.
Andrew R CraigUtah State University.
Nova Southeastern University · USUtah State University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USUniversity of New Hampshire at Manchester · US

Funding

Behavioral Persistence: Basic, Translational, and Clinical StudiesR01HD064576 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE · PI NEVIN, JOHN ANTHONY · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD064576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three experiments explored the impact of different reinforcer rates for alternative behavior (DRA) on the suppression and post-DRA relapse of target behavior, and the persistence of alternative behavior. All experiments arranged baseline, intervention with extinction of target behavior concurrently with DRA, and post-treatment tests of resurgence or reinstatement, in two- or three-component multiple schedules. Experiment 1, with pigeons, arranged high or low baseline reinforcer rates; both rich and lean DRA schedules reduced target behavior to low levels. When DRA was discontinued, the magnitude of relapse depended on both baseline reinforcer rate and the rate of DRA. Experiment 2, with children exhibiting problem behaviors, arranged an intermediate baseline reinforcer rate and rich or lean signaled DRA. During treatment, both rich and lean DRA rapidly reduced problem behavior to low levels, but post-treatment relapse was generally greater in the DRA-rich than the DRA-lean component. Experiment 3, with pigeons, repeated the low-baseline condition of Experiment 1 with signaled DRA as in Experiment 2. Target behavior decreased to intermediate levels in both DRA-rich and DRA-lean components. Relapse, when it occurred, was directly related to DRA reinforcer rate as in Experiment 2. The post-treatment persistence of alternative behavior was greater in the DRA-rich component in Experiment 1, whereas it was the same or greater in the signaled-DRA-lean component in Experiments 2 and 3. Thus, infrequent signaled DRA may be optimal for effective clinical treatment.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantReinforcement ScheduleAnimalsChildColumbidaeFemaleHumansMaleRecurrenceReinforcement, Psychologyalternative reinforcementchildrenpersistencepigeonsrelapsesignaled DRA

Identifiers

PMID27282331
PMCPMC4958596
OpenAlexW2419286073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.