Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27282089›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Modelling Adaptive Learning Behaviours for Consensus Formation in Human Societies.

Chao Yu, Guozhen Tan, Hongtao Lv, Zhen Wang, Jun Meng, Jianye Hao, Fenghui Ren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chao YuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, Liaoning, China.
Guozhen TanSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, Liaoning, China.
Hongtao LvSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, Liaoning, China.
Zhen WangSchool of Software, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116621, China.
Jun MengSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, Liaoning, China.
Jianye HaoSchool of software, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Fenghui RenSchool of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2500, Australia.
Dalian University of Technology · CNNanyang Technological University · SGTianjin University · CNUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning is an important capability of humans and plays a vital role in human society for forming beliefs and opinions. In this paper, we investigate how learning affects the dynamics of opinion formation in social networks. A novel learning model is proposed, in which agents can dynamically adapt their learning behaviours in order to facilitate the formation of consensus among them, and thus establish a consistent social norm in the whole population more efficiently. In the model, agents adapt their opinions through trail-and-error interactions with others. By exploiting historical interaction experience, a guiding opinion, which is considered to be the most successful opinion in the neighbourhood, can be generated based on the principle of evolutionary game theory. Then, depending on the consistency between its own opinion and the guiding opinion, a focal agent can realize whether its opinion complies with the social norm (i.e., the majority opinion that has been adopted) in the population, and adapt its behaviours accordingly. The highlight of the model lies in that it captures the essential features of people's adaptive learning behaviours during the evolution and formation of opinions. Experimental results show that the proposed model can facilitate the formation of consensus among agents, and some critical factors such as size of opinion space and network topology can have significant influences on opinion dynamics.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalConsensusLearningModels, TheoreticalSocial BehaviorHumans

Identifiers

PMID27282089
PMCPMC4901282
OpenAlexW2413360774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.