Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27281804›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2016

Postnatal Iron Deficiency Alters Brain Development in Piglets.

Brian J Leyshon, Emily C Radlowski, Austin T Mudd, Andrew J Steelman, Rodney W Johnson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Brian J LeyshonDivision of Nutritional Sciences.
Emily C RadlowskiDepartment of Animal Sciences, and.
Austin T MuddNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Andrew J SteelmanDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Department of Animal Sciences, and Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Rodney W JohnsonDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Department of Animal Sciences, and Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL rwjohn@illinois.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2376-1852
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Research Training Program in Toxicology and Environmental HealthT32ES007326 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Jodi A. Flaws · 2000 to 2026
$8.7M
Developmental Origins of Decreased ResilienceR01HD069899 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI JOHNSON, RODNEY W · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069899NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive deficits associated with postnatal iron deficiency (ID) suggest abnormal brain development, but little is known about animals with gyrencephalic brains.

objectiveThe objective was to assess the impact of ID on brain development in piglets.

methodsMale and female Yorkshire piglets were reared from postnatal day (PD) 2 until PD 29 or 30 by using milk replacer adequate [control (CON)] or deficient (100 compared with 10 mg/kg) in iron and subjected to MRI to assess brain macrostructure, microstructure, and metabolites in the dorsal hippocampi and intervening space. After MRI, brains were collected for histology. Hematocrit, hemoglobin, and liver iron were measured to determine iron status.

resultsHematocrit and hemoglobin in ID piglets were less than CON after PD 14 (P < 0.001), and at the study end liver iron in ID piglets was less than CON (P < 0.001). Brain region volumes were not affected by ID, but changes in brain composition were evident. ID piglets had less white matter in 78,305 voxels, with large clusters in the hippocampus and cortex. ID piglets had less gray matter in 13,625 voxels primarily in cortical areas and more gray matter in 28,017 voxels, most notably in olfactory bulbs and hippocampus. The major effect of ID on white matter was supported by lower fractional anisotropy values in the corpus callosum (0.300 compared with 0.284, P = 0.006) and in whole brain white matter (0.313 compared with 0.307, P = 0.002) in ID piglets. In coronal brain sections, corpus callosum width was less (P = 0.043) in ID piglets. Inositol was lower (P = 0.01) and phosphocholine was higher (P = 0.03) in hippocampus of ID piglets.

conclusionsPostnatal ID in piglets affects brain development, especially white matter. If the effects of ID persist, it might explain the lasting detrimental effects on cognition.

Indexed as

Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBrainBrain DiseasesFemaleMaleSwineSwine Diseaseshistologyiron deficiencymagnetic resonance imagingmicronutrient deficiencymyelinneonatalneurodevelopmentoligodendrocytepigletwhite matter

Identifiers

PMID27281804
PMCPMC4926848
OpenAlexW2417885557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.