Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27281749›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Brain heating induced by near-infrared lasers during multiphoton microscopy.

Kaspar Podgorski, Gayathri Ranganathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Measurement of the Entangled Two-Photon Absorption Cross-Sections of 4-Aminoazobenzene.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Hemodynamic and Electrophysiological Progression of the Rose Bengal Photothrombotic Stroke Model in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  11. Persistent dysmorphology and dysfunction of the brain microvasculature following repeated trauma.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaspar PodgorskiJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia podgorskik@janelia.hhmi.org.
Gayathri RanganathanJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-photon imaging and optogenetic stimulation rely on high illumination powers, particularly for state-of-the-art applications that target deeper structures, achieve faster measurements, or probe larger brain areas. However, little information is available on heating and resulting damage induced by high-power illumination in the brain. In the current study we used thermocouple probes and quantum dot nanothermometers to measure temperature changes induced by two-photon microscopy in the neocortex of awake and anaesthetized mice. We characterized heating as a function of wavelength, exposure time, and distance from the center of illumination. Although total power is highest near the surface of the brain, heating was most severe hundreds of micrometers below the focal plane, due to heat dissipation through the cranial window. Continuous illumination of a 1-mm(2) area produced a peak temperature increase of ∼1.8°C/100 mW. Continuous illumination with powers above 250 mW induced lasting damage, detected with immunohistochemistry against Iba1, glial fibrillary acidic protein, heat shock proteins, and activated caspase-3. Higher powers were usable in experiments with limited duty ratios, suggesting an approach to mitigate damage in high-power microscopy experiments.

Indexed as

HeatingAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBody TemperatureCalcium-Binding ProteinsCaspase 3FemaleGene Expression RegulationGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHeat-Shock ProteinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrofilament ProteinsMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, NeurologicalAif1 protein, mouseCalcium-Binding ProteinsCaspase 3Glial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHeat-Shock ProteinsMicrofilament Proteinshyperthermiamultifocalmultiphotonnanothermometry

Identifiers

PMID27281749
PMCPMC5009202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.