Trial reportNeurology2016
TEV-48125 for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: Efficacy at early time points.
Trial report in Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis for chronic migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Pooled it
- Gender bias in clinical trials of biological agents for migraine: A systematic review.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Optimal treatment strategy of fremanezumab in migraine prevention: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Scientific reports · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide for Migraines: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Pooled it
- European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor for migraine prevention.The journal of headache and pain · 2019Guideline
- The efficacy and safety of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody for episodic migraine: a meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018Pooled it
- Early response to eptinezumab indicates high likelihood of continued response in patients with chronic migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Eptinezumab Demonstrated Efficacy in Sustained Prevention of Episodic and Chronic Migraine Beginning on Day 1 After Dosing.Headache · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Onset of efficacy and duration of response of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: a post-hoc analysis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2019Trial
- Early onset of efficacy with erenumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2018Trial
- Real-World Lessons with Fremanezumab as the Third Available CGRP Monoclonal Antibody in a Third-Level Hospital: Focus on the Factors Predicting Response.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Prevention of Chronic Migraine: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Migraine: Advances in the Pathogenesis and Treatment.Neurology international · 2023Review
- Fremanezumab for Chronic Migraine Prevention in Japanese Patients: Subgroup Analysis from Two International Trials.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- The importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2022Article
- Improvements in pain, medication use and quality of life in onabotulinumtoxinA-resistant chronic migraine patients following erenumab treatment - real world outcomes.The journal of headache and pain · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the onset of efficacy of TEV-48125, a monoclonal antibody against calcitonin gene-related peptide, recently shown to be effective for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM) and high-frequency episodic migraine.
methodsA randomized placebo-controlled study tested once-monthly injections of TEV-48125 675/225 mg or 900 mg vs placebo. Headache information was captured daily using an electronic headache diary. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the number of headache hours in month 3. Herein, we assess the efficacy of each dose at earlier time points.
resultsThe sample consisted of 261 patients. For headache hours, the 675/225-mg dose separated from placebo on day 7 and the 900-mg dose separated from placebo after 3 days of therapy (p = 0.048 and p = 0.033, respectively). For both the 675/225-mg and 900-mg doses, the improvement was sustained through the second (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001) and third (p = 0.025 and p < 0.001) weeks of therapy and throughout the study (month 3, p = 0.0386 and p = 0.0057). For change in weekly headache days of at least moderate intensity, both doses were superior to placebo at week 2 (p = 0.031 and p = 0.005).
conclusionsTEV-48125 demonstrated a significant improvement within 1 week of therapy initiation in patients with CM. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with CM, TEV-48125 significantly decreases the number of headache hours within 3 to 7 days of injection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.