Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27281493›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2017

Perceptions of "Natural" and "Additive-Free" Cigarettes and Intentions to Purchase.

Richard J O'Connor, M Jane Lewis, Sarah E Adkison, Maansi Bansal-Travers, K Michael Cummings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Adolescents' Health Perceptions of Natural American Spirit's On-the-Pack Eco-Friendly Campaign.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Flavors and Implied Reduced-Risk Descriptors in Cigar Ads at Stores Near Schools.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Article
  17. The importance of psychology for shaping legal cannabis regulation.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard J O'Connor1 Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
M Jane Lewis2 Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Sarah E Adkison1 Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Maansi Bansal-Travers1 Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
K Michael Cummings3 Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

Tobacco Constituent and Biomarker Assessment CoreU19CA157345 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K, SHIELDS, PETER G. · 2012 to 2016
$13.3M
NCI NIH HHS U19 CA157345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In August 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued warning letters to cigarette manufacturers promoting brands as "natural" or "additive-free" because of concerns that such marketing claims might mislead consumers into believing that these brands are less dangerous to smoke than others. The current study examined consumer beliefs about the relative harms of "natural" cigarettes, and whether these beliefs influenced perceptions of advertising and purchase intentions when participants were shown an advertisement for American Spirit cigarettes. Data were collected using a web-based survey conducted in 2013 among 3,006 U.S.-based web panel members aged 15 to 65 years. Ratings of "natural" cigarette health risks (i.e., misperceptions) differed by sex, race, education, smoking status, and age. Controlling for perceived risks of other cigarette types, never smokers ( B = -0.31, p < .001) and ever/former smokers ( B = -0.15, p = .002) had significantly fewer misperceptions of "natural" cigarettes than current smokers. Current smoking (odds ratio [OR] = 17.8), believing the ad was truthful (OR = 1.18), and having more misperceptions about "natural" cigarette health risks (OR = 1.13) were independently associated with greater purchase intention. Consumers perceived cigarettes marketed as "natural" or "additive-free" as less harmful, and this influenced their perceptions of advertising claims and intention to purchase, controlling for other factors. These findings underscore Food and Drug Administration's recent warning letters.

Indexed as

IntentionTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultAdvertisingCommerceConsumer BehaviorFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedRiskSurveys and Questionnairescigaretteintentionmarketingnaturalrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID27281493
PMCPMC6390277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.