Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27281233›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2016

Vacuum Sealing Drainage Treatment Combined with Antibiotic-Impregnated Bone Cement for Treatment of Soft Tissue Defects and Infection.

Xin Liu, Jiulong Liang, Jun Zao, Liangliang Quan, Xunyuan Jia, Mingchao Li, Kai Tao

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Salvage of Infected Nasal Reconstruction with a Polymethyl Methacrylate Spacer.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2017
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Effectiveness of Antibiotic Use Management in Tianjin (2011-2013): A Quasi-Experimental Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xin Liu7th Department of Orthopedics Ward, The First Hospital of Harbin City, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland).
Jiulong LiangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area Command PLA, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Jun Zao7th Department of Orthopedics Ward, The First Hospital of Harbin City, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland).
Liangliang QuanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area Command PLA, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Xunyuan Jia7th Department of Orthopedics Ward, The First Hospital of Harbin City, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland).
Mingchao Li7th Department of Orthopedics Ward, The First Hospital of Harbin City, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland).
Kai TaoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area Command PLA, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the combined effect of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) and antibiotic-loaded bone cement on soft tissue defects and infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective non-blinded study recruited 46 patients with soft tissue defects and infection from January 2010 to May 2014 and randomly divided them into experimental and control groups (n=23). Patients in the experimental group were treated with VSD and antibiotic-loaded bone cement, while the patients in the control group were treated with VSD only. RESULTS In the experimental group, the wound was healed in 23 cases at 4 weeks postoperatively, of which direct suture was performed in 12 cases, and additional free flap transplantation or skin grafting was performed in 6 cases and 5 cases, respectively. No infection reoccurred in 1-year follow-up. In the control group, the wound was healed in 15 cases at 6 weeks postoperatively, of which direct suture was performed in 8 cases, and additional free flap transplantation or skin grafting was performed in 3 cases and 4 cases, respectively. In the other 8 cases the wound was healed at 8 weeks postoperatively. Infection reoccurred in 3 cases during the follow-up. The experimental group had significantly fewer VSD dressing renewals, shorter time needed until the wound was ready for surgery, shorter duration of antibiotic administration, faster wound healing, and shorter hospital stay than the control group (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The combination of VSD and antibiotic bone cement might be a better method for treatment of soft tissue defects and infection.

Indexed as

Bone CementsAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrainageDrug Therapy, CombinationEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyProspective StudiesPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone Cements

Identifiers

PMID27281233
PMCPMC4917306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.