ArticleNature2016
Neural correlates of single-vessel haemodynamic responses in vivo.
Article in Nature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
119 citing papers in PubMed, 211 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Substance P regulates Tacr1 neurons, which control nitric oxide-mediated neurovascular coupling in the mouse cortex.Science advances · 2026Article
- Simultaneous In Vivo Electrophysiology, Two-Photon Imaging, and Optogenetics for Probing Neurovascular Coupling.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Article
- BOLD response delays represent local cortical processing.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- Microvascular architecture and physiological fluctuations constrain the control of cerebral microcirculation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Investigating neurovascular responses of the peripapillary retinal artery to focal flicker stimulation of temporal retinal neurons in the living human eye using AO-OCT.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- VasoTracker 2: Open-source software and hardware for tracking blood vessel diameter and assessing vascular function.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Latent encoding of movement in primary visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrated two-photon and optoacoustic microscopy for functional neuroimaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cerebral blood flow and energy demand: imaging insights into neurovascular function.Neurophotonics · 2025Review
- Mapping grey and white matter activity in the human brain with isotropic ADC-fMRI.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Neurovascular coupling: a review of spontaneous neocortical dynamics linking neuronal activity to hemodynamics and what we have learned from the rodent brain.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Review
- Evaluating the dependence of ADC-fMRI on haemodynamics in breath-hold and resting-state conditions.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Functional ultrasound imaging and neuronal activity: How accurate is the spatiotemporal match?Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Simultaneous 2-photon and 3-photon excitation with a red fluorescent protein-cyanine dye probe pair in the 1700-nm excitation window for deepBiomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Distal activity patterns shape the spatial specificity of neurovascular coupling.Nature neuroscience · 2024Article
- Astrocyte Regulation of Cerebral Blood Flow in Health and Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neural activation increases blood flow locally. This vascular signal is used by functional imaging techniques to infer the location and strength of neural activity. However, the precise spatial scale over which neural and vascular signals are correlated is unknown. Furthermore, the relative role of synaptic and spiking activity in driving haemodynamic signals is controversial. Previous studies recorded local field potentials as a measure of synaptic activity together with spiking activity and low-resolution haemodynamic imaging. Here we used two-photon microscopy to measure sensory-evoked responses of individual blood vessels (dilation, blood velocity) while imaging synaptic and spiking activity in the surrounding tissue using fluorescent glutamate and calcium sensors. In cat primary visual cortex, where neurons are clustered by their preference for stimulus orientation, we discovered new maps for excitatory synaptic activity, which were organized similarly to those for spiking activity but were less selective for stimulus orientation and direction. We generated tuning curves for individual vessel responses for the first time and found that parenchymal vessels in cortical layer 2/3 were orientation selective. Neighbouring penetrating arterioles had different orientation preferences. Pial surface arteries in cats, as well as surface arteries and penetrating arterioles in rat visual cortex (where orientation maps do not exist), responded to visual stimuli but had no orientation selectivity. We integrated synaptic or spiking responses around individual parenchymal vessels in cats and established that the vascular and neural responses had the same orientation preference. However, synaptic and spiking responses were more selective than vascular responses--vessels frequently responded robustly to stimuli that evoked little to no neural activity in the surrounding tissue. Thus, local neural and haemodynamic signals were partly decoupled. Together, these results indicate that intrinsic cortical properties, such as propagation of vascular dilation between neighbouring columns, need to be accounted for when decoding haemodynamic signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.