ArticleMedicine2016
Hypersensitivity to fluoroquinolones: The expression of basophil activation markers depends on the clinical entity and the culprit fluoroquinolone.
Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post anaphylactic shock myocardial infarction (Kounis syndrome): a rare case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Real-Life Utility of Basophil Activation Test in the Diagnosis of Immediate Hypersensitivity Drug Reactions.Dermatology and therapy · 2023Article
- Tools for Etiologic Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Allergic Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Overview of Side-Effects of Antibacterial Fluoroquinolones: New Drugs versus Old Drugs, a Step Forward in the Safety Profile?Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Perioperative Anaphylaxis: Evaluation and Management.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022Review
- Review
- Biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of therapy responses in allergic diseases and asthma.Allergy · 2020Review
- Article
- Quinolone Allergy.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- BAT in the Diagnosis of Drug Allergy: a Novel Tool in Clinical Daily Practice?Current allergy and asthma reports · 2019Review
- Response to Ebo et al., Letter to the Editor Regarding Update on Quinolone Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2017Article
- Update on Quinolone Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2017Review
- In Vitro Diagnostic Testing for Antibiotic Allergy.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2017Review
- Usefulness of In Vivo and In Vitro Diagnostic Tests in the Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Quinolones and in the Evaluation of Cross-Reactivity: A Comprehensive Study Including the Latest Quinolone Gemifloxacin.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2017Article
- The Value of In Vitro Tests to DiminishDrug Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- In Vitro Diagnosis of Immediate Drug Hypersensitivity Anno 2017: Potentials and Limitations.Drugs in R&D · 2017Review
- Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Erratum: Medicine, Volume 95, Issue 23: Erratum.Medicine · 2016Article
- Standardization and Updating of a Drug Allergy Testing Program: The McGill Experience and Impact on Pharmacy Activities.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although fluoroquinolones (FQs) are generally well-tolerated antibiotics, increasing numbers of hypersensitivity reactions have been reported. These can be evaluated in vitro by basophil activation tests (BATs); however, sensitivity is not optimal. Many factors could influence sensitivity such as basophil activation markers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of 2 different activations markers, CD63 and CD203c, on the sensitivity of BAT to FQ. We studied 17 patients with immediate allergic reactions to FQ. BAT was performed with moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin using CD193 (CCR3) for basophil selection and CD203c or CD63 as activation markers. Stimulation with ciprofloxacin induced a significantly higher expression of CD63 in ciprofloxacin-allergic patients compared to moxifloxacin-allergic patients (P = 0.002). In patients allergic to moxifloxacin with anaphylactic shock, we have observed an increase in the percentage of cells that upregulate CD203c, whereas patients with anaphylaxis preferentially upregulate CD63. The best sensitivity-specificity was obtained using a cutoff of 3 and the culprit FQ, using CD203c for moxifloxacin-allergic patients (sensitivity = 36.4%; specificity = 94.4%), and CD63 for ciprofloxacin-allergic patients (sensitivity = 83.3%; specificity = 88.9%). A negative correlation was found between the upregulation of CD63 and CD203c and the time interval between the reaction occurrence and the performance of the test (Spearman r = -0.446; P < 0.001 for CD63 and Spearman r = -0.386; P < 0.001 for CD203c). The performance of BAT for FQ allergy must be optimized for each drug, taking into account possible differences in the stimulation mechanism that leads to the upregulation of different activation markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.