Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27281069›Full record

ArticleMedicine2016

Hypersensitivity to fluoroquinolones: The expression of basophil activation markers depends on the clinical entity and the culprit fluoroquinolone.

Tahia D Fernández, Adriana Ariza, Francisca Palomares, María I Montañez, María Salas, Angela Martín-Serrano, Rubén Fernández, Arturo Ruiz, Miguel Blanca, Cristobalina Mayorga and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tools for Etiologic Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Allergic Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Perioperative Anaphylaxis: Evaluation and Management.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Quinolone Allergy.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Update on Quinolone Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2017
    Review
  13. In Vitro Diagnostic Testing for Antibiotic Allergy.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. The Value of In Vitro Tests to DiminishDrug Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tahia D FernándezResearch Unit for Allergic Diseases, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga-UMA, Málaga, Spain. Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga-UMA, Málaga, Spain.
Adriana Ariza
Francisca Palomares
María I Montañez
María Salas
Angela Martín-Serrano
Rubén Fernández
Arturo Ruiz
Miguel Blanca
Cristobalina Mayorga
María J Torres
Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although fluoroquinolones (FQs) are generally well-tolerated antibiotics, increasing numbers of hypersensitivity reactions have been reported. These can be evaluated in vitro by basophil activation tests (BATs); however, sensitivity is not optimal. Many factors could influence sensitivity such as basophil activation markers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of 2 different activations markers, CD63 and CD203c, on the sensitivity of BAT to FQ. We studied 17 patients with immediate allergic reactions to FQ. BAT was performed with moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin using CD193 (CCR3) for basophil selection and CD203c or CD63 as activation markers. Stimulation with ciprofloxacin induced a significantly higher expression of CD63 in ciprofloxacin-allergic patients compared to moxifloxacin-allergic patients (P = 0.002). In patients allergic to moxifloxacin with anaphylactic shock, we have observed an increase in the percentage of cells that upregulate CD203c, whereas patients with anaphylaxis preferentially upregulate CD63. The best sensitivity-specificity was obtained using a cutoff of 3 and the culprit FQ, using CD203c for moxifloxacin-allergic patients (sensitivity = 36.4%; specificity = 94.4%), and CD63 for ciprofloxacin-allergic patients (sensitivity = 83.3%; specificity = 88.9%). A negative correlation was found between the upregulation of CD63 and CD203c and the time interval between the reaction occurrence and the performance of the test (Spearman r = -0.446; P < 0.001 for CD63 and Spearman r = -0.386; P < 0.001 for CD203c). The performance of BAT for FQ allergy must be optimized for each drug, taking into account possible differences in the stimulation mechanism that leads to the upregulation of different activation markers.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBasophilsBiomarkersFemaleFlow CytometryFluoroquinolonesFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypersensitivity, ImmediateMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsBiomarkersFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID27281069
PMCPMC4907647
OpenAlexW2475217508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.