Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27280941›Full record

ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2017

Availability of on-site acute vascular interventional radiology techniques performed by trained acute care specialists: A single-emergency center experience.

Junya Tsurukiri, Shoichi Ohta, Shiro Mishima, Hiroshi Homma, Eitaro Okumura, Itsuro Akamine, Masahito Ueno, Jun Oda, Tetsuo Yukioka

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Junya TsurukiriFrom the Emergency and Critical Care Medicine (J.T., E.O., I.A.), Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center; Emergency and Disaster Medicine (S.O., S.M., H.H., J.O., T.Y.), Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; and General Surgery (M.U.), Fuchinobe General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shoichi Ohta
Shiro Mishima
Hiroshi Homma
Eitaro Okumura
Itsuro Akamine
Masahito Ueno
Jun Oda
Tetsuo Yukioka
Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComprehensive treatment of a patient in acute medicine and surgery requires the use of both surgical techniques and other treatment methods. Recently, acute vascular interventional radiology techniques (AVIRTs) have become increasingly popular, enabling adequately trained in-house experts to improve the quality of on-site care.

methodsAfter obtaining approval from our institutional ethics committee, we conducted a retrospective study of AVIRT procedures performed by acute care specialists trained in acute medicine and surgery over a 1-year period, including those conducted out of hours. Trained acute care specialists were required to be certified by the Japanese Association of Acute Medicine and to have completed at least 1 year of training as a member of the endovascular team in the radiology department of another university hospital. The study was designed to ensure that at least one of the physicians was available to perform AVIRT within 1 h of a request at any time. Femoral sheath insertion was usually performed by the resident physicians under the guidance of trained acute care specialists.

resultsThe study sample comprised 77 endovascular procedures for therapeutic AVIRT (trauma, n = 29, and nontrauma, n = 48) among 62 patients (mean age, 64 years; range, 9-88 years), of which 55% were male. Of the procedures, 47% were performed out of hours (trauma, 52%; and nontrauma, 44%). Three patients underwent resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the emergency room. No major device-related complications were encountered, and the overall mortality rate within 60 days was 8%. The recorded causes of death included exsanguination (n = 2), pneumonia (n = 2), sepsis (n = 1), and brain death (n = 1).

conclusionWhen performed by trained acute care specialists, AVIRT seems to be advantageous for acute on-site care and provides good technical success. Therefore, a standard training program should be established for acute care specialists or trauma surgeons to make these techniques a part of the standard regimen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy/care management study, level V.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresRadiology, InterventionalAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBalloon OcclusionChildClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID27280941
PMCPMC5213014
OpenAlexW2416715193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.