ArticlePloS one2016
Seasonal Changes in Socio-Spatial Structure in a Group of Free-Living Spider Monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi).
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship between spatial and social phenotypes in an avian scavenger.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
- Drivers of Variation in the Optimal Spatial Structure of Collective Information Gatherers.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- Uncovering complementary information sharing in spider monkey collective foraging using higher-order spatial networks.Npj complexity · 2026Article
- Article
- Submissive behavior is affected by territory structure in a social fish.Current zoology · 2024Article
- Societies with fission-fusion dynamics as complex adaptive systems: the importance of scale.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Not just females: the socio-ecology of social interactions between spider monkey males.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Using network synchrony to identify drivers of social dynamics.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Should I stay or should I go? How activity synchronization affects fission decisions.Biology letters · 2022Article
- Using multiplex networks to capture the multidimensional nature of social structure.Primates; journal of primatology · 2019Article
- Seasonal and sex differences in the fission-fusion dynamics of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi yucatanensis) in Belize.Primates; journal of primatology · 2018Article
- Quantifying uncertainty due to fission-fusion dynamics as a component of social complexity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018Article
- A cross-validation-based approach for delimiting reliable home range estimates.Movement ecology · 2017Article
- Social inheritance of avoidances shapes the structure of animal social networks.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecological and social factors influence individual movement and group membership decisions, which ultimately determine how animal groups adjust their behavior in spatially and temporally heterogeneous environments. The mechanisms behind these behavioral adjustments can be better understood by studying the relationship between association and space use patterns of groups and how these change over time. We examined the socio-spatial patterns of adult individuals in a free-ranging group of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi), a species with high fission-fusion dynamics. Data comprised 4916 subgroup scans collected during 325 days throughout a 20-month period and was used to evaluate changes from fruit-scarce to fruit-abundant periods in individual core-area size, subgroup size and two types of association measures: spatial (core-area overlap) and spatio-temporal (occurrence in the same subgroup) associations. We developed a 3-level analysis framework to distinguish passive associations, where individuals are mostly brought together by resources of common interest, from active association, where individuals actively seek or avoid certain others. Results indicated a more concentrated use of space, increased individual gregariousness and higher spatio-temporal association rates in the fruit-abundant seasons, as is compatible with an increase in passive associations. Nevertheless, results also suggested active associations in all the periods analyzed, although associations differed across seasons. In particular, females seem to actively avoid males, perhaps prompted by an increased probability of random encounters among individuals, resulting from the contraction of individual core areas. Our framework proved useful in investigating the interplay between ecological and social constraints and how these constraints can influence individual ranging and grouping decisions in spider monkeys, and possibly other species with high fission-fusion dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.