Trial reportPloS one2016
Short Stature: Comparison of WHO and National Growth Standards/References for Height.
Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00960128 (NordiNet® International Outcome Study-Observational Prospective Study on Patients Treated With Norditropin®), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
NordiNet® International Outcome Study-Observational Prospective Study on Patients Treated With Norditropin®
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Updated Swiss Growth References 2025: No Height Differences, but BMI Variations Associated with Migration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Anthropometric indices growth references (length, Weight and Head Circumferences) of children aged 0-24 months in North-East of Iran by GAMLSS.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Should a single growth standard be used to judge the nutritional status of children under age 5 years globally? No.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Article
- Local anthropometric parameters for assessing double burden of malnutrition in South Asian and Southeast Asian countries: a review and retrospective analysis.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Review
- Evaluating national guidelines for monitoring early growth using routinely collected data in Bergen, Norway.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2024Article
- Comparison of Nutritional Status of Healthy Under-Five Indian Children Using Composite Index of Anthropometric Failure on WHO 2006 versus 2019 Indian Synthetic Growth Charts.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024Observational
- Ethnicity and anthropometric deficits in children: A cross-sectional analysis of national survey data from 18 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Anthropometric measures and blood pressure of Greenlandic preschool children.International journal of circumpolar health · 2021Article
- What is normal, healthy growth? Global health, human biology, and parental perspectives.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2021Review
- The legacy of a standard of normality in child nutrition research.SSM - population health · 2021Article
- Important Tools for Use by Pediatric Endocrinologists in the Assessment of Short StatureJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2021Review
- Misclassification of stunting, underweight and wasting in children 0-5 years of South Asian and Dutch descent: ethnic-specificPublic health nutrition · 2020Article
- Development of disorder-specific normative data for growth in children with cerebral palsy.European journal of pediatrics · 2019Article
- Growth of children in Greenland exceeds the World Health Organization growth charts.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2018Article
- Real-life GH dosing patterns in children with GHD, TS or born SGA: a report from the NordiNet® International Outcome Study.European journal of endocrinology · 2017Article
- The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts: A Multinational Longitudinal Study of Ultrasound Biometric Measurements and Estimated Fetal Weight.PLoS medicine · 2017Article
- Comparison of WHO 2006 Growth Standards and Synthetic Indian References in Assessing Growth in Normal Children and Children with Growth-Related Disorders.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
- Short Stature: Understanding the Stature of Ethnicity in Height Determination.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismReview
- Comparison of Nutritional Status of Under-Five Indian Children (NFHS 4 Data) Using WHO 2006 Charts and 2019 Indian Synthetic Charts.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of appropriate growth standards/references is of significant clinical importance in assessing the height of children with short stature as it may determine eligibility for appropriate therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of using World Health Organization (WHO) instead of national growth standards/references on height assessment in short children. Data were collected from routine clinical practice (1998-2014) from nine European countries that have available national growth references and were enrolled in NordiNet® International Outcome Study (IOS) (NCT00960128), a large-scale, non-interventional, multinational study. The patient cohort consisted of 5996 short pediatric patients diagnosed with growth hormone deficiency (GHD), Turner syndrome (TS) or born small for gestational age (SGA). The proportions of children with baseline height standard deviation score (SDS) below clinical cut-off values (-2 SDS for GHD and TS; -2.5 SDS for SGA) based on national growth references and WHO growth standards/references were compared for children aged <5 years and children aged ≥5 years. In seven of the countries evaluated, significantly fewer children aged ≥5 years with GHD (22%; P<0.0001), TS (21%; P<0.0001) or born SGA (32%; P<0.0001) had height below clinical cut-off values using WHO growth references vs. national references. Likewise, among children aged <5 years in the pooled analysis of the same seven countries, a significantly lower proportion of children with GHD (8%; P<0.0001), TS (12%; P = 0.0003) or born SGA (12%; P<0.0001) had height below clinical cut-off values using WHO growth standards vs. national references. In conclusion, in NordiNet® IOS the number of patients misclassified using WHO growth standards/references was significantly higher than with national references. This study highlights that, although no growth reference has 100% sensitivity for identifying growth disorders, the most recent national or regional growth charts may offer the most appropriate tool for monitoring childhood growth in Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.