ReviewCurrent cardiology reviews
Contextualizing Genetics for Regional Heart Failure Care.
Review in Current cardiology reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burden from Study Questionnaire on Patient Fatigue in Qualitative Congestive Heart Failure Research.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- The Wider Considerations in Closing Chronic Disease Gaps - Focus on Heart Failure and Implementation.Current cardiology reviews · 2023Review
- Pharmacogenomics Informs Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Clinical impact of echocardiography parameters and molecular biomarkers in heart failure: Correlation ofExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Deciphering key genes in cardio-renal syndrome using network analysis.Bioinformation · 2021Article
- Risk stratification for coronary artery disease in multi-ethnic populations: Are there broader considerations for cost efficiency?World journal of methodology · 2019Review
- Chronic Heart Failure and Comorbid Renal Dysfunction - A Focus on Type 2 Cardiorenal Syndrome.Current cardiology reviewsReview
- Heart Failure in Minority Populations - Impediments to Optimal Treatment in Australian Aborigines.Current cardiology reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a chronic and often devastating cardiovascular disorder with no cure. There has been much advancement in the last two decades that has seen improvements in morbidity and mortality. Clinicians have also noted variations in the responses to therapies. More detailed observations also point to clusters of diseases, phenotypic groupings, unusual severity and the rates at which CHF occurs. Medical genetics is playing an increasingly important role in answering some of these observations. This developing field in many respects provides more information than is currently clinically applicable. This includes making sense of the established single gene mutations or uncommon private mutations. In this thematic series which discusses the many factors that could be relevant for CHF care, once established treatments are available in the communities; this section addresses a contextual role for medical genetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.