ArticlePloS one2016
The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Scientific evolution and translational horizons of plant core germplasm: a global bibliometric synthesis and strategic insights.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Pooled it
- Genetic diversity, population structure, and interspecific differentiation in introduced breeding populations of Eucalyptus sideroxylon and Eucalyptus camaldulensis established in northern Chile.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Non-Authentic Genotypes-An Unrevealed Problem in Plant Research and Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identification of diagnostic KASP-SNP markers for routine breeding activities in yam (Dioscorea spp.).The plant genome · 2024Article
- Genetic variation among elite inbred lines suggests potential to breed for BNI-capacity in maize.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Adaptive significance of affiliative behaviour differs between sexes in a wild reptile population.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Low-Density Reference Fingerprinting SNP Dataset of CIMMYT Maize Lines for Quality Control and Genetic Diversity Analyses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure among cultivated potato clones from Korea and global breeding programs.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Core Collections: Is There Any Value for Cotton Breeding?Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Developing and deploying an efficient genotyping workflow for accelerating maize improvement in developing countries.Gates open research · 2022Article
- Assessment of the Genetic Structure and Diversity of Soybean (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Development and validation of diagnostic SNP markers for quality control genotyping in a collection of four rice (Oryza) species.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis of leaf related traits in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.).BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Molecular Fingerprinting and Hybridity Authentication in Cowpea Using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Based Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR Assay.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Distinguishing Between Nile Tilapia Strains Using a Low-Density Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Panel.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Identification of QTLs for grain yield and other traits in tropical maize under Striga infestation.PloS one · 2020Article
- Genotyping-by-Sequencing Derived Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Provide the First Well-Resolved Phylogeny for the GenusFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Development of diagnostic SNP markers for quality assurance and control in sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] breeding programs.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality control (QC) of germplasm identity and purity is a critical component of breeding and conservation activities. SNP genotyping technologies and increased availability of markers provide the opportunity to employ genotyping as a low-cost and robust component of this QC. In the public sector available low-cost SNP QC genotyping methods have been developed from a very limited panel of markers of 1,000 to 1,500 markers without broad selection of the most informative SNPs. Selection of optimal SNPs and definition of appropriate germplasm sampling in addition to platform section impact on logistical and resource-use considerations for breeding and conservation applications when mainstreaming QC. In order to address these issues, we evaluated the selection and use of SNPs for QC applications from large DArTSeq data sets generated from CIMMYT maize inbred lines (CMLs). Two QC genotyping strategies were developed, the first is a "rapid QC", employing a small number of SNPs to identify potential mislabeling of seed packages or plots, the second is a "broad QC", employing a larger number of SNP, used to identify each germplasm entry and to measure heterogeneity. The optimal marker selection strategies combined the selection of markers with high minor allele frequency, sampling of clustered SNP in proportion to marker cluster distance and selecting markers that maintain a uniform genomic distribution. The rapid and broad QC SNP panels selected using this approach were further validated using blind test assessments of related re-generation samples. The influence of sampling within each line was evaluated. Sampling 192 individuals would result in close to 100% possibility of detecting a 5% contamination in the entry, and approximately a 98% probability to detect a 2% contamination of the line. These results provide a framework for the establishment of QC genotyping. A comparison of financial and time costs for use of these approaches across different platforms is discussed providing a framework for institutions involved in maize conservation and breeding to assess the resource use effectiveness of QC genotyping. Application of these research findings, in combination with existing QC approaches, will ensure the regeneration, distribution and use in breeding of true to type inbred germplasm. These findings also provide an effective approach to optimize SNP selection for QC genotyping in other species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.