Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27280153›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Topographical Organization of Attentional, Social, and Memory Processes in the Human Temporoparietal Cortex.

Kajsa M Igelström, Taylor W Webb, Yin T Kelly, Michael S A Graziano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neural signatures of prosocial behaviors.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Attention, awareness, and the right temporoparietal junction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Other people's gaze encoded as implied motion in the human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The evolution of the temporoparietal junction and posterior superior temporal sulcus.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kajsa M IgelströmPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University , Princeton, New Jersey 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-1904-5554
Taylor W WebbPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University , Princeton, New Jersey 08544.
Yin T KellyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University , Princeton, New Jersey 08544.
Michael S A GrazianoPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University , Princeton, New Jersey 08544.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The temporoparietal junction (TPJ) is activated in association with a large range of functions, including social cognition, episodic memory retrieval, and attentional reorienting. An ongoing debate is whether the TPJ performs an overarching, domain-general computation, or whether functions reside in domain-specific subdivisions. We scanned subjects with fMRI during five tasks known to activate the TPJ, probing social, attentional, and memory functions, and used data-driven parcellation (independent component analysis) to isolate task-related functional processes in the bilateral TPJ. We found that one dorsal component in the right TPJ, which was connected with the frontoparietal control network, was activated in all of the tasks. Other TPJ subregions were specific for attentional reorienting, oddball target detection, or social attribution of belief. The TPJ components that participated in attentional reorienting and oddball target detection appeared spatially separated, but both were connected with the ventral attention network. The TPJ component that participated in the theory-of-mind task was part of the default-mode network. Further, we found that the BOLD response in the domain-general dorsal component had a longer latency than responses in the domain-specific components, suggesting an involvement in distinct, perhaps postperceptual, computations. These findings suggest that the TPJ performs both domain-general and domain-specific computations that reside within spatially distinct functional components.

Indexed as

Brain MappingSocial BehaviorAttentionFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryNerve NetNeuropsychological TestsOxygenParietal LobeSignal Detection, PsychologicalTemporal LobeOxygenangular gyrusblind source separationdata-driven fMRI analysissuperior temporal gyrus and sulcussupramarginal gyrus

Identifiers

PMID27280153
PMCPMC4894915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.