Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27280088›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2016

Progression of coronary artery calcification at the crossroads: sign of progression or stabilization of coronary atherosclerosis?

Gaston A Rodriguez-Granillo, Patricia Carrascosa, Nico Bruining

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Preclinical techniques to investigate exercise training in vascular pathophysiology.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gaston A Rodriguez-Granillo1 Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Diagnóstico Maipú, Buenos Aires, Argentina ; 2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina ; 3 Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Patricia Carrascosa1 Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Diagnóstico Maipú, Buenos Aires, Argentina ; 2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina ; 3 Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nico Bruining1 Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Diagnóstico Maipú, Buenos Aires, Argentina ; 2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina ; 3 Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diagnostico Maipú · ARErasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) has been strongly established as an independent predictor of adverse events, with a significant incremental prognostic value over traditional risk stratification algorithms. CAC progression has been associated with a higher rate of events. In parallel, several randomized studies and meta-analysis have shown the effectiveness of statins to slow progression and even promote plaque regression. However, evidence regarding the effect of routine medical therapy on CAC has yielded conflicting results, with initial studies showing significant CAC regression, and contemporaneous data showing rather the opposite. Accordingly, there is currently a great controversy on whether progression of CAC is a sign of progression or stabilization of coronary artery disease (CAD). The finding of inexorable CAC progression despite the implementation of intensive contemporaneous medical therapy suggests that further understanding of this phenomenon should be undertaken before the implementation of CAC as a surrogate endpoint for longitudinal studies, or for prospective follow-up of patients under routine medical treatment.

Indexed as

atherothrombosisimaginglongitudinal studiesPrognostic valuestatin

Identifiers

PMID27280088
PMCPMC4880753
OpenAlexW2299657552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.