ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2016
Utility of brain natriuretic peptide assay as a predictor of short term outcomes in patients presenting with syncope to the emergency department.
Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictors of Short-Term Outcomes after Syncope: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of troponins and natriuretic peptides in syncope: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Article
- Serum Levels of Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide and the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Cardiac Syncope.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2024Article
- Risk Stratification of Older Adults Who Present to the Emergency Department With Syncope: The FAINT Score.Annals of emergency medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSyncope is a common condition that accounts for 3% of emergency department (ED) visits and 1-6% of hospital admissions. Current admissions practices result in marginal diagnostic and therapeutic benefit and consume healthcare resources.
methodsThis prospective cohort study examined the use of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) test as a predictor of short term serious outcome in 159 patients who presented to ED with syncope between August 2012 and August 2013 in two tertiary teaching medical centers.
resultsA total of 41 patients (36%) had serious outcomes within 1 month, 21 of them were in the low BNP group and 20 were in the high BNP group. There was a significantly higher incidence of serious outcomes, myocardial infarction (MI), and life-threatening arrhythmias in the high BNP group. Patients with BNP >250 has an 8.844 fold increase risk of serious outcomes [odds ratio (OR) 8.844, 95% CI: (3.281 to 23.8), P<0.001], a 14.8-fold increase risk of MI [OR =14.8, 95% CI: (1.57 to 139), P=0.011], and a 4.46-fold increase risk life threatening arrhythmia [OR =4.46, 95% CI: (1.15-18.8), P=0.034]. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in one month mortality, major bleeding, major cardiac procedures or stroke.
conclusionsOur study results further validates the ROSE rule and the utility of BNP in risk stratification of syncope patients. This study showed that measuring BNP and adding ROSE rule to the standard evaluation of syncope can sufficiently predict short-term serious outcomes for patients presenting to ED with syncope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.