Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27279900›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2016

Deep metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses of microbial communities affiliated with an industrial biogas fermenter, a cow rumen, and elephant feces reveal major differences in carbohydrate hydrolysis strategies.

Simon Güllert, Martin A Fischer, Dmitrij Turaev, Britta Noebauer, Nele Ilmberger, Bernd Wemheuer, Malik Alawi, Thomas Rattei, Rolf Daniel, Ruth A Schmitz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effect of nano-AlRSC advances · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. A Review on Bacterial Contribution to Lignocellulose Breakdown into Useful Bio-Products.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Simon GüllertDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Biocenter Klein Flottbek, University of Hamburg, Ohnhorststr. 18, 22609 Hamburg, Germany.
Martin A FischerInstitute for General Microbiology, Christian Albrecht University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Dmitrij TuraevCUBE-Division for Computational Systems Biology, Dept. of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, Vienna, Austria.
Britta NoebauerCUBE-Division for Computational Systems Biology, Dept. of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, Vienna, Austria.
Nele IlmbergerDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Biocenter Klein Flottbek, University of Hamburg, Ohnhorststr. 18, 22609 Hamburg, Germany.
Bernd WemheuerInstitute of Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 8, Göttingen, Germany.
Malik AlawiBioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, Germany ; Heinrich Pette Institute, Leibniz Institute for Experimental Virology, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas RatteiCUBE-Division for Computational Systems Biology, Dept. of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, Vienna, Austria.
Rolf DanielInstitute of Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 8, Göttingen, Germany.
Ruth A SchmitzInstitute for General Microbiology, Christian Albrecht University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Adam GrundhoffHeinrich Pette Institute, Leibniz Institute for Experimental Virology, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, Germany.
Wolfgang R StreitDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Biocenter Klein Flottbek, University of Hamburg, Ohnhorststr. 18, 22609 Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diverse microbial communities in agricultural biogas fermenters are assumed to be well adapted for the anaerobic transformation of plant biomass to methane. Compared to natural systems, biogas reactors are limited in their hydrolytic potential. The reasons for this are not understood.

resultsIn this paper, we show that a typical industrial biogas reactor fed with maize silage, cow manure, and chicken manure has relatively lower hydrolysis rates compared to feces samples from herbivores. We provide evidence that on average, 2.5 genes encoding cellulolytic GHs/Mbp were identified in the biogas fermenter compared to 3.8 in the elephant feces and 3.2 in the cow rumen data sets. The ratio of genes coding for cellulolytic GH enzymes affiliated with the Firmicutes versus the Bacteroidetes was 2.8:1 in the biogas fermenter compared to 1:1 in the elephant feces and 1.4:1 in the cow rumen sample. Furthermore, RNA-Seq data indicated that highly transcribed cellulases in the biogas fermenter were four times more often affiliated with the Firmicutes compared to the Bacteroidetes, while an equal distribution of these enzymes was observed in the elephant feces sample.

conclusionsOur data indicate that a relatively lower abundance of bacteria affiliated with the phylum of Bacteroidetes and, to some extent, Fibrobacteres is associated with a decreased richness of predicted lignocellulolytic enzymes in biogas fermenters. This difference can be attributed to a partial lack of genes coding for cellulolytic GH enzymes derived from bacteria which are affiliated with the Fibrobacteres and, especially, the Bacteroidetes. The partial deficiency of these genes implies a potentially important limitation in the biogas fermenter with regard to the initial hydrolysis of biomass. Based on these findings, we speculate that increasing the members of Bacteroidetes and Fibrobacteres in biogas fermenters will most likely result in an increased hydrolytic performance.

Indexed as

Anaerobic digestionBiofuelsBiogasBiorefineryCellulasesLignocellulosic biomassMetagenomicsMicrobial communitiesPULs

Identifiers

PMID27279900
PMCPMC4897800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.