Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27279227›Full record

ArticleNature2016

Overcoming mTOR resistance mutations with a new-generation mTOR inhibitor.

Vanessa S Rodrik-Outmezguine, Masanori Okaniwa, Zhan Yao, Chris J Novotny, Claire McWhirter, Arpitha Banaji, Helen Won, Wai Wong, Mike Berger, Elisa de Stanchina and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 273 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
273citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

273 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 473 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A renaissance in targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vanessa S Rodrik-OutmezguineProgram in Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Masanori OkaniwaHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
Zhan YaoProgram in Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Chris J NovotnyHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
Claire McWhirterAstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG, UK.
Arpitha BanajiProgram in Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Helen WonHuman Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Wai WongAnti-Tumor Assessment Core, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Mike BergerHuman Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Elisa de StanchinaAnti-Tumor Assessment Core, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Derek G BarrattAstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG, UK.
Sabina CosulichAstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG, UK.
Teresa KlinowskaAstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG, UK.
Neal RosenProgram in Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Kevan M ShokatHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
The Role of Id Proteins in Breast TumorigenesisP01CA094060 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI NORTON, LARRY · 2002 to 2018
$39.4M
The Role of Focal Oncogene Amplifications in Lung CancerP01CA129243 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Piro Lito · 2007 to 2026
$31.2M
Vector, Transgenic, and Imaging CoreP50AA017072 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RON, DORIT · 2008 to 2017
$13.9M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN CHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL BIOLOGYT32GM064337 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRAIK, CHARLES SCOTT · 2002 to 2021
$7.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P01 CA094060NCI NIH HHS P01 CA129243NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA017072NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM064337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicines exert selective pressure on tumour cells that leads to the preferential growth of resistant subpopulations, necessitating the development of next-generation therapies to treat the evolving cancer. The PIK3CA-AKT-mTOR pathway is one of the most commonly activated pathways in human cancers, which has led to the development of small-molecule inhibitors that target various nodes in the pathway. Among these agents, first-generation mTOR inhibitors (rapalogs) have caused responses in 'N-of-1' cases, and second-generation mTOR kinase inhibitors (TORKi) are currently in clinical trials. Here we sought to delineate the likely resistance mechanisms to existing mTOR inhibitors in human cell lines, as a guide for next-generation therapies. The mechanism of resistance to the TORKi was unusual in that intrinsic kinase activity of mTOR was increased, rather than a direct active-site mutation interfering with drug binding. Indeed, identical drug-resistant mutations have been also identified in drug-naive patients, suggesting that tumours with activating MTOR mutations will be intrinsically resistant to second-generation mTOR inhibitors. We report the development of a new class of mTOR inhibitors that overcomes resistance to existing first- and second-generation inhibitors. The third-generation mTOR inhibitor exploits the unique juxtaposition of two drug-binding pockets to create a bivalent interaction that allows inhibition of these resistant mutants.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCell Line, TumorDrug ResistanceFemaleHumansMiceMutationNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Structure, TertiarySignal TransductionTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysMTOR protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID27279227
PMCPMC4902179
OpenAlexW2407198816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.