ArticleNature2016
Misconduct: Lessons from researcher rehab.
Article in Nature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leadership, management, and team practices in research labs: Development and validation of two new measures.Accountability in research · 2025Article
- Ethical decision-making and role conflict in managing a scientific laboratory.Accountability in research · 2024Article
- Ethical, regulatory, and practical barriers to COVID-19 research: A stakeholder-informed inventory of concerns.PloS one · 2022Article
- Navigating Complex, Ethical Problems in Professional Life: a Guide to Teaching SMART Strategies for Decision-Making.Journal of academic ethics · 2021Article
- Development of a Resource Guide to Help Patients Receive Appropriate Care.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2021Article
- Leading the people and leading the work: Practical considerations for ethical research.Translational issues in psychological science · 2020Article
- What Explains Associations of Researchers' Nation of Origin and Scores on a Measure of Professional Decision-Making? Exploring Key Variables and Interpretation of Scores.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- Leading for research excellence and integrity: A qualitative investigation of the relationship-building practices of exemplary principal investigators.Accountability in research · 2019Article
- Article
- Design, implementation, and evaluation of PINDAR, a novel short program on GCP for academic medical center principal investigators conducting human subject research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- Development and Preliminary Validation of a New Measure of Values in Scientific Work.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2018Article
- Five Dimensions of Research Ethics: A Stakeholder Framework for Creating a Climate of Research Integrity.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2018Article
- It's 10 pm; Do You Know Where Your Data Are? Data Provenance, Curation, and Storage.Circulation research · 2017Review
- Are Leadership and Management Essential for Good Research? An Interview Study of Genetic Researchers.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27279195What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.