Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27279023›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Kecheng Huang, Haiying Sun, Xiong Li, Ting Hu, Ru Yang, ShaoShuai Wang, Yao Jia, Zhilan Chen, Fangxu Tang, Jian Shen and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Kecheng HuangFrom Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Haiying SunFrom Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiong LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wuhan Central Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ting HuFrom Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ru YangHenan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
ShaoShuai WangFrom Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yao JiaFrom Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhilan ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Fangxu TangFrom Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jian ShenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wuhan Central Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaomin QinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiangfan Central Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Xiangfan, Hubei, China.
Hang ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Runfeng YangHubei Tumor Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Juan GuiRenmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lin WangFrom Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaolin ZhaoTai-He Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Jincheng ZhangShanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiong LiuShanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lili GuoTai-He Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Shuang LiFrom Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shixuan WangFrom Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNTongji Hospital · CNCentral Hospital of Wuhan · CNHenan Cancer Hospital · CNHubei University of Medicine · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNGeneral Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command · CNNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to develop a risk model for disease recurrence among cervical cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery. Data for 853 patients were obtained from a retrospective study and used to train the model, and then data for 447 patients from a prospective cohort study were employed to validate the model. The Cox regression model was used for calculating the coefficients of the risk factors. According to risk scores, patients were classified into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups. There were 49 (49/144, 34%) recurrences observed in the high-risk group (with a risk score ≥ 2.65), compared with 3 (3/142, 2%) recurrences in the low-risk group (with a risk score < 0.90). Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly different (log-rank p < 0.001) among the three risk groups; the risk model also revealed a significant increase in the accuracy of predicting 5-year DFS with the area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.754 for risk model vs 0.679 for FIGO stage system); the risk model was also validated with data from the prospective study (log-rank p < 0.001, AUC = 0.766). Both high-risk and intermediate-risk patients can be more effectively identified by this risk model.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyAdultAntineoplastic AgentsArea Under CurveChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRiskAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27279023
PMCPMC4899714
OpenAlexW2408826115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.