ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2017
A pH-dependent charge reversal peptide for cancer targeting.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational Design of Pore-Forming Peptides with Potent Antimicrobial and Anticancer Activities.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Design of pH-responsive antimicrobial peptide melittin analog-camptothecin conjugates for tumor therapy.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Antimicrobial Peptides: Mechanisms of Action and Resistance.Journal of dental research · 2017Review
- pH Dependent Antimicrobial Peptides and Proteins, Their Mechanisms of Action and Potential as Therapeutic Agents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Naturally occurring cationic antimicrobial peptides exhibit not only antimicrobial activity, but also anticancer activity and are expected to be new weapons in cancer treatment. The selectivity for cancer cells over normal cells is at least partly due to the more negative surface of cancer cells. A lower pH in tumor tissue (pH 6.2-6.9) than that in normal tissues (pH 7.3-7.4) has also been utilized to develop anticancer agents. However, cytotoxicity against normal cells at physiological pH is often an issue. Furthermore, acidic regions can be found in some normal tissues such as the kidneys. Therefore, existing approaches to cancer targeting are not fully satisfactory. In this study, we designed a peptide, HE (GIHHWLHSAHEFGEHFVHHIMNS-amide), with a charge that reverses from -1.5 at pH 7.4 to +6 at pH 5.5 for cancer targeting at low pH based on the antimicrobial peptide magainin 2 by introducing 6 His, an additional Glu, and an amidated terminal. HE interacted with cancer-mimicking negatively charged liposomes in a pH-dependent fashion with a midpoint with a pH of 6.5 just above the membrane surface. The peptide killed human renal adenocarcinoma ACHN cells at pH 6.0, but not at pH 7.4, and was nontoxic against human normal glomerular mesangial cells even at this low pH. Thus, the novel peptide may be a promising lead peptide for cancer therapy, although this derivatization resulted in weakened cytotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.