Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27278666›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematology2016

Bone marrow transplantation versus immunosuppressive therapy in patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia.

Andrea Bacigalupo, Sabrina Giammarco, Simona Sica

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Future directions in transplantation for aplastic anemia.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for aplastic anemia.International journal of hematology · 2024
    Review
  11. "Never say never" to transplant in aplastic anemia! A case study.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea BacigalupoIstituto di Ematologia, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, Rome, Italy. Andrea.bacigalupo@unicatt.it.
Sabrina GiammarcoIstituto di Ematologia, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, Rome, Italy.
Simona SicaIstituto di Ematologia, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard front-line treatment for acquired aplastic anemia (AA) for patients is either immunosuppressive therapy (IST) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT), usually from an HLA identical sibling. Whereas long-term survival is comparable with either treatment, important differences remain: IST patients may have incomplete or no recovery, are exposed to late clonal disorders and relapse of the original disease. Transplantation is a curative treatment, but patients are exposed to transplant-related complications both acute and chronic, such as chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHD). In the year 2000, a study by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), looked at failure free survival (FFS), in patients receiving first-line BMT from an HLA identical sibling, or the first-line IST. Young patients with low neutrophil counts benefited of the first-line BMT; the opposite was true for older patients with higher neutrophil counts; and a third intermediate group of patients had comparable survival irrespective of the first-line therapy. We have now studied a more recent cohort of patients to assess whether things have changed over the years. We have found similar results, although overall survival has improved, as a consequence of changes in the IST and BMT protocols.

Indexed as

Anemia, AplasticBone Marrow TransplantationHumansImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsTreatment OutcomeImmunosuppressive AgentsAplastic anemiaBone marrow transplantationImmunosuppressive therapy

Identifiers

PMID27278666
OpenAlexW2418980574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.