Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27278632›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2016

Diagnostic Utility of Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization.

Osamah Aldoss, Brian M Fonseca, Uyen T Truong, John Bracken, Jeffrey R Darst, Ruixin Guo, Tamekia L Jones, Thomas E Fagan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation guided by three-dimensional rotational angiography.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation.Korean circulation journal · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Osamah AldossDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa and Children's Hospital of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Brian M FonsecaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Uyen T TruongDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
John BrackenPhilips Research North America, Briarcliff Manor, NY, 10510, USA.
Jeffrey R DarstDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Ruixin GuoDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Tamekia L JonesDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Foundation Research Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center and Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN, 38103, USA.
Thomas E FaganDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center and Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, 49 N. Dunlap Street, Floor 3, Memphis, TN, 38103, USA. tfagan1@uthsc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the diagnostic utility of the three modalities of three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA): rotational angiography (RA), multiplanar reformat (MPR) and three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction (3D-R) in pediatric cardiac catheterization. The 3DRA studies were classified by anatomy of interest based on our injection protocol: pulmonary arteries (PA), aorta, cavopulmonary connection (CPC), and others. Retrospective review of 3DRA images by two reviewers for each modality was conducted with grading as inferior, similar, or superior in comparison with the diagnostic quality of fixed-plane angiography (FPA). The percentages of grades for each modality were averaged. Weighted kappa statistic was used to evaluate inter-rater reliability. In total, 114 3DRA studies were performed on 87 patients between August 2010 and March 2012. Median age was 2.7 years (1 day-48.4 years) and median weight 12.1 kg (3.6-106.5 kg). For RA: 79.4 % of the studies were of diagnostic quality and 52.2 % were superior; 3D-R: 82 % were of diagnostic quality and 65.8 % were superior; and MPR: 83.5 % were of diagnostic quality and 63 % were superior. Overall 3DRA technologies (RA, 3D-R, MPR) were of diagnostic quality or better in 111/114 (97.4 %) studies and 103/114 (90.4 %) were judged superior. Most common reasons for inferior grading were limited opacification and metallic artifact. In pediatric cardiac catheterization, 3DRA imaging was of diagnostic quality and frequently provided additional clinically relevant data when compared to FPA.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationAdolescentAdultAngiographyChildChild, PreschoolHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult3DRACongenital heart diseaseMultiplanar reconstructionStructural heart diseaseThree-dimensional angiographic reconstructionThree-dimensional rotational angiography

Identifiers

PMID27278632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.