Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27278630›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2016

Screening for Congenital Heart Disease in Infants with Down Syndrome: Is Universal Echocardiography Necessary?

Soujanya Bogarapu, Nelangi M Pinto, Susan P Etheridge, Xiaoming Sheng, Kirk N Liesemer, Paul C Young, Elizabeth V Saarel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of Echocardiography and 64-Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Soujanya BogarapuDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Utah, Primary Children's Hospital, Primary Children's Eccles Building, 81 N. Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84113, USA. soujanya.bogarapu@hsc.utah.edu.
Nelangi M PintoDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Utah, Primary Children's Hospital, Primary Children's Eccles Building, 81 N. Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84113, USA.
Susan P EtheridgeDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Utah, Primary Children's Hospital, Primary Children's Eccles Building, 81 N. Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84113, USA.
Xiaoming ShengDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 81 N Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84113, USA.
Kirk N LiesemerMadigan Army Medical Center, 9040 Fitzsimmons Drive, Tacoma, WA, 98431, USA.
Paul C YoungDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 81 N Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84113, USA.
Elizabeth V SaarelDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
University of Utah · USCleveland Clinic · USMadigan Army Medical Center · USPrimary Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend that all neonates with Down syndrome (DS) be screened for congenital heart disease (CHD) with an echocardiogram. We sought to determine the effectiveness of a more accessible and less expensive screening strategy consisting of physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), and chest X-ray. The Intermountain Healthcare Enterprise Data Warehouse was used to identify infants with a positive karyotype for DS who were born between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2012. Infants with the results of an echocardiogram, physical examination, ECG, and chest X-ray documented at age ≤6 months were included. Infants with an abnormality on physical examination, ECG, or chest X-ray were considered to have a positive screen. Echocardiography was the gold standard for calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for major CHD, defined as any heart defect that would typically require intervention during early childhood. Of 408 eligible infants, 240 (59 %) had major CHD, of whom 228 (95 %) had a positive screen. Screening missed eight infants with moderate/large patent ductus arteriosus and four infants with a moderate/large atrial septal defect. In 11 of these infants, the defect resolved spontaneously by age ≤4 months. One infant had a moderate atrial septal defect persisting at 2-year follow-up. Sensitivity and specificity of the screening for detecting CHD were 95 % (CI 92-98 %) and 41 % (CI 32-47 %); positive and negative predictive values were 69 % (CI 63-73 %) and 85 % (CI 75-92 %). Screening with physical examination, ECG, and chest X-ray is an effective method of identifying which infants with DS should have an echocardiogram. This method would have resulted in 69 (17 %) fewer echocardiograms without missing infants with major CHD.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalDown SyndromeDuctus Arteriosus, PatentEchocardiographyHeart Septal Defects, AtrialHumansInfantChest X-rayCongenital heart diseaseDown syndromeEchocardiogramElectrocardiogramPhysical examination

Identifiers

PMID27278630
OpenAlexW2415163206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.