Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27278551›Full record

ReviewUpdates in surgery2016

Colorectal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it.

Giacomo Ruffo, Giuliano Barugola, Roberto Rossini, Carlo Augusto Sartori

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Updates in surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giacomo RuffoDepartment of General Surgery, Sacro Cuore Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Giuliano BarugolaDepartment of General Surgery, Sacro Cuore Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy. giuliano.barugola@sacrocuore.it.
Roberto RossiniDepartment of General Surgery, Sacro Cuore Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy. roberto.rossini@sacrocuore.it.
Carlo Augusto SartoriDepartment of General Surgery, Sacro Cuore Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the quality and effectiveness of care is a key priority of any health policy. The outcomes of health care can be considered as indicators of effectiveness or quality. The scientific literature that evaluates the association between the volume of activity and the outcome of health interventions has greatly developed over the past decade, but, for practical reasons, ethical and social issues, a few randomized controlled studies were made to evaluate this association, although there are numerous observational studies of outcome and systematic reviews of the studies themselves. The colorectal surgery is the most studied area and it represents the ideal testing ground to determine the effectiveness of the quality indicators because of the high incidence of the disease and the wide spread in the territory of the structures that aim to tackle these issues. Numerous studies have documented an association between the large number of colo-rectal surgical procedures and the quality of results. In particular, the volume of activity is one of the characteristics of measurable process that can have a significant impact on the outcome of health care. In conclusion, the ability to use volume thresholds as a proxy for quality is very tempting but it is only part of reality. Infact, the volume-outcome relationship strictly depends on the type of cancer (colon vs rectum) and it appears somehow stronger for the individual surgeon than for the hospital; especially for the 5-year overall survival, operative mortality and number of permanent stoma.

Indexed as

AccreditationColorectal SurgeryOutcome Assessment, Health CareTertiary Care CentersColorectal NeoplasmsDigestive System Surgical ProceduresHumansItalyAccreditationColorectal surgeryLaparoscopySurgical wardsVolumes of surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.