ArticleSurgery today2017
A comparative study on the complications of conventional and end-to-side inserting pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Article in Surgery today, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical impact of atrophic changes in remnant pancreas on the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2022Article
- Number of acinar cells at the pancreatic stump predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgery today · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePancreatico-digestive anastomosis is important in ensuring the safety of pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study compared the postoperative complications of a newly developed method of inserting end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy with the conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
methodsFrom April 2012 to December 2015, 108 consecutive patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at Kumamoto University Hospital. A modified child's reconstruction was performed with the inserting or conventional pancreaticojejunostomy. The clinical course and the incidence of postoperative complications were retrospectively evaluated.
resultsFive patients were excluded, four who underwent hepato-pancreatoduodenectomy and one who did not require pancreaticojejunostomy because of an atrophic pancreatic remnant. Of the 103 patients that were included in the analysis, 41 and 62 underwent surgery with the inserting and conventional methods, respectively. The incidence of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade > II complications was similar in the two groups [36.6 % (15/41) vs 27.4 % (17/62)]. However, the rates of grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula [7.3 % (3/41) vs 0 % (0/62) P = 0.030] and re-operation for postoperative complications [14.6 % (6/41) vs 3.2 % (2/62), P = 0.034] were significantly higher in the inserting group than in the conventional group. There were no in-hospital deaths in either group.
conclusionsThe conventional pancreaticojejunostomy is safer than the end-to-side inserting pancreaticojejunostomy, as the latter is associated with a risk of severe complications. Improvements in pancreatico-digestive anastomosis techniques are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.