ArticleJournal of echocardiography2012
Comparison of the effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonist monotherapy and combination therapy with a diuretic on cardiac function in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Article in Journal of echocardiography, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preclinical magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the fields of radiological technology, medical physics, and radiology.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Review
- The neuroprotective agent Rasagiline mesylate attenuates cardiac remodeling after experimental myocardial infarction.ESC heart failure · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLosartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), has been reported to promote sodium excretion and show an enhanced antihypertensive effect when used in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). We investigated the effects of losartan monotherapy and combination therapy together with HCTZ on cardiac function in hypertensive rats using echocardiography.
methodsSpontaneously hypertensive rats (n = 21) fed on high-salt diet (8 % NaCl) for 13 weeks were randomly assigned to rats without medication (HS, n = 7), those medicated with ARB (ARB, losartan 30 mg/kg/day, n = 8), and those with ARB and HCTZ (ARB + HCTZ, losartan 30 mg/kg/day + HCTZ 10 mg/kg/day, n = 6). Blood pressure measurements and echocardiography were performed at 13, 17, and 29 weeks of age. After the end of the protocol, the proportion of cardiac muscle fibrosis was measured histologically.
resultsIn the HS group, blood pressure and left ventricular mass/body weight (LV mass/BW) increased, and % fractional shortening (%FS) and early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e') decreased significantly with age. In the ARB group, although blood pressure and %FS were maintained, LV mass/BW increased with age as in the HS group, and e' decreased. In the ARB + HCTZ group, blood pressure decreased and LV mass/BW, %FS, and e' were maintained. The progression of myocardial fibrosis was clearly prevented in rats treated with ARB.
conclusionARB was shown to inhibit systolic disorder and myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive rats. Combination therapy proved to be more effective than monotherapy and is also effective in inhibiting diastolic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.