Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27278231›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction update2016

Gamete activation: basic knowledge and clinical applications.

Elisabetta Tosti, Yves Ménézo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction update, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07570342 (Comparison of Two Types of Calcium), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07570342 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Two Types of Calcium (Ca²⁺) Ionophore Treatments for Oocyte Activation in Cases of Suboptimal Fertilization Potential

TypeinterventionalSponsorART Fertility Clinics LLCRan2026 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsICSI, Testicular Sperm Extraction in Azoospermic Patients, Male Infertility, PGT-AArmsGroup 1: Oocyte Activation (OA) CultActive, Group 2: Oocyte Activation (OA) Ionomycin, Group 3: Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Reprotoxic Impact of Environment, Diet, and Behavior.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisabetta TostiStazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, Naples 80121, Italy tosti@szn.it.
Yves MénézoLondon Fertility Associates, 104 Harley Street, London WIG7JD, UK.
Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe first clues to the process of gamete activation date back to nearly 60 years ago. The mutual activation of gametes is a crucial event during fertilization. In the testis and ovaries, spermatozoa and oocytes are in a state of meiotic and metabolic quiescence and require reciprocal signals in order to undergo functional changes that lead to competence for fertilization. First, the oocyte activates sperm by triggering motility, chemoattraction, binding and the acrosome reaction, culminating with the fusion of the two plasma membranes. At the end of this cascade of events, collectively known as sperm capacitation, sperm-induced oocyte activation occurs, generating electrical, morphological and metabolic modifications in the oocyte. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The aim of this review is to provide the current state of knowledge regarding the entire process of gamete activation in selected specific animal models that have contributed to our understanding of fertilization in mammals, including humans. Here we describe in detail the reciprocal induction of the two activation processes, the molecules involved and the mechanisms of cell interaction and signal transduction that ultimately result in successful embryo development and creation of a new individual. SEARCH

methodsWe carried out a literature survey with no restrictions on publication date (from the early 1950s to March 2016) using PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar and Web of Knowledge by utilizing common keywords applied in the field of fertilization and embryo development. We also screened the complete list of references published in the most recent research articles and relevant reviews published in English (both animal and human studies) on the topics investigated. OUTCOMES: Literature on the principal animal models demonstrates that gamete activation is a pre-requisite for successful fertilization, and is a process common to all species studied to date. We provide a detailed description of the dramatic changes in gamete morphology and behavior, the regulatory molecules triggering gamete activation and the intracellular ions and second messengers involved in active metabolic pathways in different species. Recent scientific advances suggest that artificial gamete activation may represent a novel technique to improve human IVF outcomes, but this approach requires caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Although controversial, manipulation of gamete activation represents a promising tool for ameliorating the fertilization rate in assisted reproductive technologies. A better knowledge of mechanisms that transform the quiescent oocyte into a pluripotent cell may also provide new insights for the clinical use of stem cells.

Indexed as

Sperm CapacitationAnimalsEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleFertilizationHumansMaleOocytesReproductive Techniques, AssistedSpermatozoaSperm-Ovum Interactionsartificial oocyte activationassisted reproductive technologyfertilizationgamete activationICSIIVFoocytereproductionsperm

Identifiers

PMID27278231
PMCPMC4917743
OpenAlexW2409626331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.