ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2016
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a novel intraperitoneal lightweight mesh coated with hyaluronic acid: 1-year follow-up from a case-control study using the Hernia-Club registry.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Standardization of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernia: Impact on clinical outcome and quality-of-life (LIPOM trial, NCT 02089958).Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of prehabilitation for patients undergoing complex abdominal wall surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of absorbable and non-absorbable fixation systems for intraperitoneal mesh fixation: an experimental study in swine.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Article
- Predictive factors of recurrence for laparoscopic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernias with single mesh from a multicenter study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Assessing the Validity and Cover Rate of the National Swedish Hernia Register.Clinical epidemiology · 2021Article
- Patient's satisfaction at 2 years after groin hernia repair: any difference according to the technique?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018Observational
- Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA case-control study was performed to compare laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) using the Ventralight ST™ lightweight surgical mesh with LVHR using other types of mesh.
methodsAdult patients undergoing intraperitoneal implantation of Ventralight ST™ during LVHR (Ventralight ST™ group; VG) over a 2-year period (2011-2013) were identified from the prospective French Hernia-Club registry. Patients undergoing elective LVHR using other types of intraperitoneal mesh in the first semester of 2013 formed the control group (CG). Patient, hernia and surgical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes after 8 days, 1 month, and 1 year were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe VG comprised 90 LVHRs in 85 patients, and the CG 86 LVHRs in 81 patients. Patient, hernia and surgical characteristics were similar between the two groups, apart from the method of mesh fixation and the number of procedures involving fascial closure. A low rate of minor complications was observed in both groups at 1 month [4.4 % (VG) and 2.3 % (CG)], and the level of postoperative pain was similar in the two groups at Day 8 and 1 month. After 1 year, no complications, recurrences or cases of chronic pain had occurred in either group, and Quality-of-Life outcomes were similar. Patients rated their procedure as excellent or good in 96 % (VG) and 92 % (CG) of cases.
conclusionsVentralight ST™ mesh is effective and well tolerated in LVHR, producing very low complication and recurrence rates in the short and medium term. The results are comparable to those achieved with other types of mesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.