Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27278157›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in toxicology2016

Comprehensive review of epidemiological and animal studies on the potential carcinogenic effects of nicotine per se.

Hans-Juergen Haussmann, Marc W Fariss

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Can electronic-cigarette vaping cause cancer?Journal of cancer biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Electronic-cigarette smoke induces lung adenocarcinoma and bladder urothelial hyperplasia in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Mitochondria as a possible target for nicotine action.Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes · 2019
    Review
  17. Journal Club-Electronic Cigarettes and Vaping as a Harm Reduction Alternative: Really?Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2019
    Article
  18. Acute pulmonary effects of aerosolized nicotine.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Are electronic cigarettes a healthier alternative to conventional tobacco smoking?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hans-Juergen Haussmanna Toxicology Consultant , Roesrath , Germany ;
Marc W Farissb Altria Client Services LLC , Richmond , VA , USA.
Altria (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of long-term use of nicotine per se on cancer risk, in the absence of tobacco extract or smoke, are not clearly understood. This review evaluates the strength of published scientific evidence, in both epidemiological and animal studies, for the potential carcinogenic effects of nicotine per se; that is to act as a complete carcinogen or as a modulator of carcinogenesis. For human studies, there appears to be inadequate evidence for an association between nicotine exposure and the presence of or lack of a carcinogenic effect due to the limited information available. In animal studies, limited evidence suggests an association between long-term nicotine exposure and a lack of a complete carcinogenic effect. Conclusive studies using current bioassay guidelines, however, are missing. In studies using chemical/physical carcinogens or transgenic models, there appears to be inadequate evidence for an association between nicotine exposure and the presence of or lack of a modulating (stimulating) effect on carcinogenesis. This is primarily due to the large number of conflicting studies. In contrast, a majority of studies provides sufficient evidence for an association between nicotine exposure and enhanced carcinogenesis of cancer cells inoculated in mice. This modulating effect was especially prominent in immunocompromized mice. Overall, taking the human and animal studies into consideration, there appears to be inadequate evidence to conclude that nicotine per se does or does not cause or modulate carcinogenesis in humans. This conclusion is in agreement with the recent US Surgeon General's 2014 report on the health consequences of nicotine exposure.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinogensEpidemiologic MeasurementsHumansModels, AnimalNicotineCarcinogensNicotineBioassaycancercarcinogenesiscotinineepidemiologynicotinetoxicokineticsxenograft

Identifiers

PMID27278157
PMCPMC5020336
OpenAlexW2409033800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.