ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2014
Real-time tissue elastography (RTE) for noninvasive evaluation of fibrosis in liver diseases in children in comparison to liver biopsy.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in quantitative ultrasound for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease diagnosis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Limitations and opportunities of non-invasive liver stiffness measurement in children.World journal of hepatology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the value of real-time tissue elastography (RTE) in pediatric liver diseases in comparison to liver biopsy.
methodsRTE was performed on 34 patients (♀, n = 17; ♂, n = 17; range 0-21 years) with various acute and chronic liver diseases: autoimmune hepatitis (n = 5), liver transplantation (n = 5), Wilson's disease (n = 4), hepatopathy of unknown origin (n = 4), unclear cholestatic hepatitis (n = 2), thalassemia major (n = 2), glycogenosis (n = 2), hereditary fructose intolerance (n = 1), alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (n = 1), diabetes mellitus type 1 (n = 1), chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (n = 1), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 1), hepatitis B (n = 1), cirrhosis of unknown origin (n = 1), drug-induced hepatopathy (n = 1), unexplained transaminase elevation (n = 1), and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (n = 1). Included children were biopsied. RTE was performed on a control group (n = 30; ♀, n = 15; ♂, n = 15). The mean value of strain (MEAN) in arbitrary units and the ratio of blue color-coded harder tissue (AREA) were calculated based on an elasticity histogram of the selected region of interest in liver parenchyma. They were compared with the histologically defined grade of liver fibrosis.
resultsIn comparison to the scoring systems, a moderate correlation was observed for MEAN and AREA by excluding the F0 patients [MEAN r = -0.575 to -0.645, AREA r = 0.545-0.607 (p < 0.05)]. Differentiation of the control group and low-grade fibrosis (F1) from high-grade fibrosis (F2-4) was significantly possible (p values <0.001 at 5 % significance level).
conclusionRTE parameters enable a possible differentiation of high fibrosis; however, their correlation with fibrosis stage was moderate. RTE seems to be a promising method in liver fibrosis grading in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27278026What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.