Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27277950›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2016

Attention bias to threat indicates anxiety differences in sheep.

Caroline Lee, Else Verbeek, Rebecca Doyle, Melissa Bateson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Modifying the Attention Bias Test to Assess the Emotional State of Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Behaviours of farmed saltwater crocodiles (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline LeeCSIRO, Agriculture, Armidale, Australia caroline.lee@csiro.au.
Else VerbeekCSIRO, Agriculture, Armidale, Australia.
Rebecca DoyleAnimal Welfare Science Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Melissa BatesonCentre for Behaviour and Evolution, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0861-0191
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUNewcastle University · GBThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J016446/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and animals show increased attention towards threatening stimuli when they are in increased states of anxiety. The few animal studies that have examined this phenomenon, known as attention bias, have applied environmental manipulations to induce anxiety but the effects of drug-induced anxiety levels on attention bias have not been demonstrated. Here, we present an attention bias test to identify high and low anxiety states in sheep using pharmacological manipulation. Increased anxiety was induced using 1-methyl-chlorophenylpiperazine (m-CPP) and decreased anxiety with diazepam, and then we examined the behaviour of sheep in response to the presence of a dog as a threat. Increased attention towards the threat and increased vigilance were shown in sheep that received the m-CPP and reduced in sheep receiving the diazepam. The modulated attention towards a threat displayed by the m-CPP and diazepam animals suggests that attention bias can assess different levels of anxiety in sheep. Measuring attention bias has the potential to improve animal welfare assessment protocols.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasAnimalsAnti-Anxiety AgentsAnxietyDiazepamDogsFearFeeding BehaviorFemalePiperazinesSerotonin Receptor AgonistsSheep, Domestic1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazineAnti-Anxiety AgentsDiazepamPiperazinesSerotonin Receptor Agonistsaffective statesanimal welfarethreat perceptionvigilance

Identifiers

PMID27277950
PMCPMC4938034
OpenAlexW2414351620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.